On 12 January 2021 at 20:38, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
| On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 at 20:23, <luke-tier...@uiowa.edu> wrote:
| >
| > After some discussions we've settled on a syntax of the form
| >
| > mtcars |> subset(cyl == 4) |> d => lm(mpg ~ disp, data = d)
| >
| > to handle cases where the pipe lhs needs to be passed to an argument
| > other than the first of the function called on the rhs. This seems a
| > to be a reasonable balance between making these non-standard cases
| > easy to see but still easy to write. This is now committed to R-devel.
|
| Interesting. Is the use of "d =>" restricted to pipelines? In other
| words, I think that it shouldn't be equivalent to "function(d)", i.e.,
| that this:
|
| x <- d => lm(mpg ~ disp, data = d)
|
| shouldn't work.
Looks like your wish was already granted:
> mtcars |> subset(cyl == 4) |> d => lm(mpg ~ disp, data = d)
Call:
lm(formula = mpg ~ disp, data = subset(mtcars, cyl == 4))
Coefficients:
(Intercept) disp
40.872 -0.135
> d => lm(mpg ~ disp, data = d)
Error in `=>`(d, lm(mpg ~ disp, data = d)) : could not find function "=>"
> x <- d => lm(mpg ~ disp, data = d)
Error in `=>`(d, lm(mpg ~ disp, data = d)) : could not find function "=>"
>
Dirk
--
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
