Hello,
I recently stumbled upon the fact that different 32-bit R Windows versions
produce slightly different results when calling 'lm'. More precisely, this
seems to be caused by a change in the transition from R 3.2.x to R 3.3.0.
A minimal example, for reproducing this is "lm(y~x, data.frame(x=c(1,2,3),
y=c(1,2,3)))".
In R 3.3.0 the result is
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = data.frame(x = c(1, 2, 3), y = c(1,
2, 3)))
Coefficients:
(Intercept) x
0 1
In R 3.2.4 Revised on gets the result
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = data.frame(x = c(1, 2, 3), y = c(1,
2, 3)))
Coefficients:
(Intercept) x
-4.441e-16 1.000e+00
Both versions behave identically until the call C_Cdqrls in the fit.lm
function. What causes this changed behavior?
Best regards,
Andreas Fromkorth.
Next PLA 3.0 Trainings (Business classes): www.bioassay.de/training
<http://www.bioassay.de/training>
_____________________________________________________
Dr. Andreas Fromkorth
Project Manager
andreas.fromko...@stegmannsystems.com
Stegmann Systems GmbH, Raiffeisenstr. 2, 63110 Rodgau, Germany
Fon: +49 (6106) 77010-0, Direct: +49 (6106) 77010-213, Fax: +49 (6106) 77010-190
Handelsregister/Commercial Register Offenbach HRB 43033
Gesch?ftsf?hrer/CEO: Dr. Ralf Stegmann
Pick a product: APS
2.10<https://www.aps-info.de/?utm_source=signatur&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=E-Mail-Signatur>
| PLA
3.0<https://www.bioassay.de/?utm_source=signatur&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=E-Mail-Signatur>
www.stegmannsystems.com<https://www.stegmannsystems.com/?utm_source=signatur&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=E-Mail-Signatur>
Follow us on LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/stegmann-systems-gmbh>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
