The more general alternative Gabor in this case would be a stopif() function... I often find myself having to think too much with stopifnot(!is.X())
Sean On 4 January 2014 00:24, Gábor Csárdi <csardi.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: > While we are here, how about an is.sorted() function? It is trivial > and helps readability a lot imho. Then one does not have to write > things like > > stopifnot(!is.unsorted(x)) > > but can write > > stopifnot(is.sorted(x)) > > instead. > > Gabor > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Patrick Burns <pbu...@pburns.seanet.com> > wrote: > > > > I've just realized that it could be handy > > to have a 'decreasing' argument in 'is.unsorted'. > > > > And I'm cheekily hoping someone else will > > implement it. > > > > It is easy enough to work around (with 'rev'), > > but would be less hassle with an argument. > > The case I have in mind uses 'is.unsorted' in > > 'stopifnot'. > > > > Pat > > > > -- > > Patrick Burns > > pbu...@pburns.seanet.com > > twitter: @burnsstat @portfolioprobe > > http://www.portfolioprobe.com/blog > > http://www.burns-stat.com > > (home of: > > 'Impatient R' > > 'The R Inferno' > > 'Tao Te Programming') > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
