We are having a similar issue with rpy2 and R-devel. I would also vote for having back a C-level solution to the problem.
I cannot find an explicit explanation for the change in the SVN logs, and traced the change to rev 61771: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r61771 | ripley | 2013-01-29 12:09:45 +0100 (Tue, 29 Jan 2013) | 1 line more hiding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Could this mean that the change could reverted and Rf_PrintWarnings just be added to the C API ? Laurent On 2013-03-07 12:00, r-devel-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
Hi! In RKWard we use R_tryEval() at a number places to run R commands. In order to make sure that any generated warnings become visible close to the problem, we were following up (most of) these calls with Rf_PrintWarnings(). Rf_PrintWarnings() was never available in the headers (as far as I know), and in r61771 the symbol has been hidden from libR.so. So this solution is no longer available. Could you give advice on the best way to print warnings before returning to the top level? Some available options, I am aware of: 1. Call R function warnings(). However, this will always print the latest warning, even if it was generate by some earlier command. I would need a way to print new warnings, only. 2. Use options(warn=1) where applicable. However, in some cases, collecting warnings until some procedure is complete, and printing them then, would be preferrable. 3. I see there is an internal call printDeferredWarnings(), which seems to be almost exactly what I want. However, using an .Internal() does not look like a terribly stable solution, either. Also, having direct access to a similar function from the C-API would be very comfortable. Thanks! Thomas
______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
