On 12-05-16 4:59 PM, Terry Therneau wrote:
I've been tracking down a survival problem from R-help today. A short
version of the primary issue is reconstructed by the following simple
example:
library(survival)
attach(lung)
fit<- coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ log(age))
predict(fit, newdata=data.frame(abe=45))
Note the typo in the last line of "abe" instead of "age". Instead of an
error message, this returns predictions for all the subjects since
model.frame matches "age" by searching more widely. I'd prefer the error.
I suspect this is hard -- I'd like it to not see the attached lung data
set, but still be able to find the log function.
Is there a not-horribly-complex solution?
The best solution is to not use attach(), use data=lung in the fit.
I think if you want to use attach but limit the search, you need
something like
predict(fit, newdata=list2env(data.frame(abe=45), parent=baseenv()))
but I don't think that meets your "not horribly complex" criterion.
Duncan Murdoch
I also tried to change the primary function to lm instead of coxph. It
has the same problem, but does print a warning that the newdata and
results have different lengths (which I will incorporate).
Terry T.
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
