On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12-05-08 1:46 AM, Joshua Wiley wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I just downloaded the source tar ball (Revision: 59324 Last Changed >> Date: 2012-05-07) and tried to compile on a Win x64 system. I am >> using Rtools version 2.15.0.1919. The only change I make is changing >> MkRules.dist -> MkRules.local and setting Multi=64 I have previously >> compiled unsuffered consquences without issue, but on the current >> version, I get this error >> >> >> windres -F pe-x86-64 -I../include -i dllversion.rc -o dllversion.o >> comm: file 2 is not in sorted order >> make[3]: *** [R.dll] Error 1 >> make[2]: *** [../../bin/x64/R.dll] Error 2 >> make[1]: *** [rbuild] Error 2 >> make: *** [all] Error 2 >> >> I did not note any other errors or warnings earlier on, though I may >> have missed some. I can provide the full log if requested. Any >> ideas? > > > I believe that message is about the file src/gnuwin32/Rdll.hide. It is > supposed to be sorted, using ASCII collation order. I believe the version > in the repository is sorted properly; can you check yours?
Thanks for your reply. It looks sorted correctly and explicitly sorting prior to running make does not change the error. here is a bit of output: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress@28 BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress@24 BZ2_bzCompress@8 BZ2_bzCompressEnd@4 BZ2_bzCompressInit@16 BZ2_bzDecompress@4 BZ2_bzDecompressEnd@4 BZ2_bzDecompressInit@12 BZ2_bzRead@16 BZ2_bzReadClose@8 BZ2_bzReadGetUnused@16 BZ2_bzReadOpen@24 BZ2_bzWrite@16 BZ2_bzWriteClose64@28 BZ2_bzWriteClose@20 > > We've had some problems with recent versions of Cygwin not sorting properly. > The last instance had it put names in the order > > BZ2_bzWriteClose@20 > BZ2_bzWriteClose64@28 > > but ASCII order should put @ after 6. Are you using the comm and Cygwin > dlls from Rtools, or have you got newer ones? As far as I know I should only be using the dlls from Rtools. It is the first thing on my path environment variable, and although cygwin is installed, I do not even have it on my path. Interestingly, there are no problems if set MULTI=32 instead of 64 in MkRules. Thanks again, Josh > > Duncan Murdoch -- Joshua Wiley Ph.D. Student, Health Psychology Programmer Analyst II, Statistical Consulting Group University of California, Los Angeles https://joshuawiley.com/ ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel