On Apr 6, 2012, at 22:23 , Hervé Pagès wrote:
> On 04/06/2012 12:33 PM, Brad McNeney wrote:
>> OK, thanks for the tip on good coding practice. I'm still getting the NOTE
>> though when I make the suggested change.
>
> Because when you do return(RutgersMapB36[,1]), the code checker has no
> way to know that the RutgersMapB36 variable is actually defined.
>
> Try this:
>
> test<-function() {
> RutgersMapB36 <- NULL
> data(RutgersMapB36)
> return(RutgersMapB36[,1])
> }
>
That might remove the NOTE, but as far as I can see, it also breaks the code...
--
Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
