R developers,
If the absence of a more complete zlib is a permanent change, then is
the best strategy to build and distribute a package that wraps a
functional zlib? This seems like it will create problems with symbol
resolution at the least. Including a zlib in each package that uses it
also seems like a poor choice. What other strategies are recommended?
Martin
On 05/06/2011 09:58 AM, Martin Morgan wrote:
This change has significant consequences for Windows packages using R's
zlib, including packages providing core Bioconductor functionality. Are
the changes in r55624 meant to be long-term?
Martin
On 04/29/2011 03:13 PM, Martin Morgan wrote:
Several Bioconductor packages were expecting Windows Rzlib.dll to
provide gzopen / gzread / gzseek / gzgets / gzrewind / gzclose. Are
these gone for good, viz., r55624 ?
Martin
--
Computational Biology
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109
Location: M1-B861
Telephone: 206 667-2793
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
