We have no position about Fortran 90. We provide the means to specify
an F90 compiler and note that its use is not portable as not all
platforms have one. (A very few are still using gcc3 with g77.)
This simply is not an R issue, and seems specific to your unstated
platform (*PLEASE* do follow the posting guide).
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, jgar...@ija.csic.es wrote:
Hi there,
I am preparing a package based on Fortran 90 code. I've put the main code
is a MODULE, and I'm having several error messages with the linker:
R CMD SHLIB --output=mylib.so nrtype.f90 topbalmod.f90 runmodels.f90
The several error messages are related with the addition of an underscore
to function names (no problem with subroutine names). E.g.:
topbalmod.o:topbalmod.f90:<.text+0x357f>: undefined reference to 'runga_'
After some googling, AFAIK, it seems the addition of underscores (I'm
using gfortran) may be avoided by the option -fno-underscoring, but its
use is not recomended as it is not of general use by all compilers.
I'm just wondering if R developers just recommend not to use user defined
fortran functions at all to avoid this problem, or alternatively if you
could provided with some example about how to circumvent it (perhaps to
convert all fortran 90 functions into subroutines?).
Thanks and best regards.
Javier
---
--
Brian D. Ripley, rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
