For consistency with rowSums colSums rowMeans etc., the names should be
colMins colMaxs
rowMins rowMaxs
This is also consistent with S+.
FYI, the rowSums naming convention was chosen to avoid conflict
with rowsum (which computes column sums!).
Tim Hesterberg
>> A well-designed API generalized to work with arrays should probably
>> borrow ideas from how argument 'MARGIN' of apply() works, how argument
>> 'dim' in rowSums() for (though I must say the letter seem a bit ad hoc
>> at first sight given the name of the function). ?There may also be
>> something to learn from the 'reshape' package and so.
>
>I'd also recommend looking at plyr::aaply, which fixes a few things
>that have always annoyed me about apply - namely that it is not
>idempotent/identical to aperm when the summary function is the
>identity.
>
>Hadley
>
>--
>Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair
>Department of Statistics / Rice University
>http://had.co.nz/
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
