Hi Dan,
Is there a reason you can't change the function to
f <- function(x, ...) {}
?
Hadley
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Daniel Murphy <chiefmur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> R-Devel:
>
> I am trying to get an attribute of the first argument in a call to a
> function whose formal arguments consist of dots only and do something, e.g.,
> call 'cbind', based on the attribute
> f<- function(...) {get first attribute; maybe or maybe not call 'cbind'}
>
> I thought of (ignoring "deparse.level" for the moment)
>
> f<-function(...) {x <- attr(list(...)[[1L]], "foo"); if (x=="bar")
> cbind(...) else x}
>
> but I feared my solution might do some extra copying, with a performance
> penalty if the dotted objects in the actual call to "f' are very large.
>
> I thought the following alternative might avoid a potential performance hit
> by evaluating the attribute in the parent.frame (and therefore avoid extra
> copying?):
>
> f<-function(...)
> {
> L<-match.call(expand.dots=FALSE)[[2L]]
> x <- eval(substitute(attr(x,"foo"), list(x=L[[1L]])))
> if (x=="bar") cbind(...) else x
> }
>
> system.time tests showed this second form to be only marginally faster.
>
> Is my fear about extra copying unwarranted? If not, is there a better way to
> get the "foo" attribute of the first argument other than my two
> alternatives?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan Murphy
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
--
Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair
Department of Statistics / Rice University
http://had.co.nz/
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
