It is true RHmm is *not* available in the public central repositories. I think it's in Bioconductor. That said, the "installation process" was the usual one from the GUI drop down, after electing repositories. What that does behind the scenes is something I do not know, but I don't see how I could know.
Just letting somebody know. If you don't want to use the information, that's cool with me. On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:04 +0100, "Uwe Ligges" <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > > > On 17.01.2010 16:33, Jan Theodore Galkowski wrote: > > I admire package-builders being proactive and having their facilities > > ready for upcoming R releases. However, if the publicly released > > version of R is 2.10.1 and a package is built for R 2.11.0, users get > > the embarrassing notice about a disconnect, > > What a disconnect? > > > > and cannot do much about it. > > They should install the version that is intended for R-2.10.x releases, > not the one for the development version. > The RHmm version in the 2.10 repository in CRAN has > > Built: R 2.10.1; i386-pc-mingw32; 2010-01-03 15:59:39 UTC; windows > > > hence built with R-2.10.x as required. > > > > > If it is tedious to roll out a new package on time, perhaps there's a > > possibility for automation here. > > > It is automated and we are currently building for R-2.9.x, R-2.10.x and > R-devel (the latter in 32-bit and 64-bit), and you have just to say > install.packages() and your R wil grab the right version. I suspect you > downloaded something manually from the wrong repository. > > Uwe Ligges > > > > > > > Thanks. I encountered this yesterday with RHmm. I'm running R on > > WinXP. > > [snip] -- Jan Theodore Galkowski (o°) 607.239.1834 [mobile] 617.547.1221 [home] 617.444.4995 [work] bayesianlo...@acm.org http://www.ekzept.net "Eppur si muove." --Galilei ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
