Simon Urbanek a écrit :
On Nov 28, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
FWIW what I think you should be really looking at is
R_PreserveObject/R_ReleaseObject.
OK. Thanks.
I would suggest looking at the many other R embeddings in other languages that
already exist since I don't think you approach is very viable (but I think I
expressed that already before).
Lisp - the only thing I've seen is a translator:
http://dan.corlan.net/R_to_common_lisp_translator/
I haven't found a binding for Haskell. Nor for Scheme.
Do you know of any bindings of R to functional languages?
since I don't think you approach is very viable (but I think I expressed that
already before).
You expressed the sentiment that it would be a very bad idea to bypass
the current API. I would be happy to hear why you would think that a
low-level binding is not possible, or not very viable.
By low-level, I mean a binding that takes hold of R objects without
using symbols all over to reference them. (Using symbols in the formals,
the body or the environment of a closure is fine, for instance, but I'd
like to execute a closure directly, and eventually be able to construct
R closure from OCaml functions).
Please elaborate on the difficulties you perceive. That would be helpful.
Cheers,
Simon
All the best,
Guillaume.
--
Guillaume Yziquel
http://yziquel.homelinux.org/
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
