Hi Dirk, * On 2009-01-30 at 22:38 -0600 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Turns out, as so often, that there was a regular bug lurking which is now > fixed in RDieHarder 0.1.1. But I still would like to understand exactly what > is different so that --slave was able to trigger it when --vanilla, > --no-save, ... did not. > > [ The library() vs require() issue may have been a red herring. ]
Without telling us any details about the nature of the bug you found, it is difficult to speculate. If the bug was in your C code and memory related, it could simply be that the two different run paths resulted in different allocation patterns, one of which triggered the bug. + seth -- Seth Falcon | http://userprimary.net/user/ ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
