> >> anyone object to bringing it back?
> >>
> DM> Yes, I would.
>
> and so would probably almost everyone in R-core.
> We *did* think already back in the last millennium...
> and removed them for a good reason
> {IIRC, because there were always cases where they were attached
> to the wrong expression, and we were more or less convinced,
> there was no to do it "right" in all cases}.
>
>
Yes. Well, there was no _obvious_ way to do it right. If someone sets
out to do it right, we might want the result, but it is definitely not
as easy as reinstating the 1999 code, which would do fun stuff like
moving end-loop comments to the start of the loop (and in glm.fit, the
end-loop comment was, and still is, "## -- end IRLS iteration --"!!). It
requires a substantial parser rewrite.
The main issue is that you wold need the parser to retain more
information about the textual layout of its input, probably not only
about the comments, but also about line breaks. If you consider
moderately complex syntactical structures, like for loops and switch
expressions, all the points where you could potentially insert a
comment or break the line, and then try to insert that information in
the parse tree, chances are you come out utterly confused. Notice, in
particular, that everything is ambiguous, if you have two successive
expressions and a comment on the line in between, does it belong with
the former or the latter expression? And what about
plot(
x=foo, # abscissa
y=bar # ordinate
)
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
