>> It is desirable that these tags and their syntax and semantics be >> compatible with those used by Doxygen and Javadoc, but extended with >> tags important for R specific things. > > Doxygen, in particular, has some tags that are meaningless in R > (@category and @protocol come to mind); wouldn't it be worthwhile, > therefore, to start with a subset of Rd? > > Thinks like @name and @format could be gleaned from the code; and it > seems like preserving other Rd names would uphold the "principle of > least surprise." >
Yes, actually I did not meant that you have to take the union of Javadoc and Doxygen keywords and try to fit it into R. Start with the things from R documentation, extend it with usefull R-specific keywords (like @export). And keep in mind that there may be users which use Doxygen and Javadoc and we want to uphold the "principle of least surprise". :-) Manuel. ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
