On 1/15/2007 5:43 PM, Arne Henningsen wrote: > On Monday, 15. January 2007 18:44, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> On 1/15/2007 11:23 AM, Arne Henningsen wrote: >>> On Friday, 12. January 2007 11:39, you wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> I think you misunderstood me, given the "long answer". >>> Indeed, I misunderstood you. >>> >>>> We haven't >>>> changed the way deparse() handles "/". The solution in R-devel is given >>>> below. >>> I prefer to use "keep.source=FALSE", because I generally like that Sweave >>> takes the job to format the code chunks. Therefore, it would be great if >>> Sweave is allowed to introduce line breaks after forward slashes, e.g. if >>> deparse() adds a blank after a forward slash. >>> Please move this wish from "wishlst-fulfilled" to "wishlst". >> I don't think so. If I thought it was a reasonable request, I'd do >> that, but it's not. You have a perfectly general solution to your >> problem. > > However, setting "keep.source = FALSE" has (IMHO) one major advantage: > I can easily (and globally) change the width of the code chunks by "options( > width = XXX )", e.g. if I change the paper size, the margins or the font > size. With "keep.source = TRUE", I would have to reformat all code chunks by > hand and I generally prefer that my software (LaTeX, Sweave) does this task > for me. Hence, "keep.source = TRUE" is not a "perfectly general solution" > (at least) for me.
No, you would only have to reformat the one code chunk where you set keep.source = TRUE. It doesn't need to be a global option. >> The fact that it isn't the one you want doesn't mean it needs >> to be listed as an outstanding issue in the bug reporting system. > > Okay. Where can I list "minor" wishes? On your to-do list? Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
