On 5/21/06, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. I should have realized that. Now that I read it again with > your explanation it is clear. > > At the same time it would be convenient if one could specify a viewport > or vpPath, as well. If that were the case we could also eliminate the > names.* methods in this example. (These were included to encapsulate > access to them so that the main code does not muck around in the > internals.)
Probably true, but that's a change that belongs in grid. I don't want to make unnecessary assumptions about grid functions and then be caught by an API change (which is one of the reasons I don't want to be explicit in ?print.trellis about what the 'draw.in' argument must be). Deepayan ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
