p.s. Note that one workaround is
> bar <- function(n,...) { f <- function() foo(...);
+ replicate(n,f()) }
> bar(10,3)
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10]
[1,] 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
[2,] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
A little while ago, Jason Eisner wrote:
> I am using R version 2.0.0 (2004-10-04) on Fedora Core 2.
>
> This works correctly:
>
>> foo <- function(x=1,y=2) { c(x,y) }
>> bar <- function(n,...) c(n,foo(...))
>> bar(10,3)
> [1] 10 3 2
>
> But it goes wrong if I replace "c" in bar with "replicate":
>
>> foo <- function(x=1,y=2) { c(x,y) }
>> bar <- function(n,...) replicate(n,foo(...))
>> bar(10,3)
> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10]
> [1,] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> [2,] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
>
> It is mysterious why x was bound to the apparently arbitrary
> value 0 while y was left at its default.
>
> The ... arguments to bar seems to be ignored altogether.
> bar(10), bar(10,x=3), and bar(10,3,4) give the same result.
> Furthermore, bar(10,extra=3) does not give an error.
>
> Perhaps this mysterious behavior is unavoidable because of
> the kind of hack replicate is?
>
> Thanks ...
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
