Adding Mark McLoughlin, as this is regarding stable. I also thought about the important of better gating for stable when I saw that regression. And while I think that regression was specific to the linux bridge, and thus may not have been caught by the gate anyway, gating is nonetheless extremely important for stable releases. This is doubly true once you get to the point where some backports to stable/folsom are not just cherry-picks due to code diversion.
Both patches are pretty tiny in terms of non-test code changes, and they only affect the debug-agent itself, so I would probably saw that if they are all that we need to backport in able to get gating working with stable/folsom, it would be a win. I'd want to hear from others, particular Mark McLoughlin and garyk, as they spend more time thinking about stable branch than I do. Dan On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Nachi Ueno <na...@nttmcl.com> wrote: > Hi Dan, Gary > > Now gating looks works fine. > I have seen the regression bug for backport patches also. > > So I would like to work on enable gating for stable releases. > > In order to do this, some bug fix needed to quantum-debug command > This need command argument change for quantum-debug command. > However this function is experimental in Folsom release, so I tend to > think to allow exception here is valuable > > - quantum-debug didn't work with external network > https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1070960 > > - quantum-debug command should use QUANTUM_ prefixed environment variables > https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1077204 > > Thanks > Nachi > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core Post to : quantum-core@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
