On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Robert Spier <rsp...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Matt Simerson <m...@tnpi.net> wrote: > > --- > plugins/spamassassin | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/plugins/spamassassin b/plugins/spamassassin > index 4ca890e..534d712 100644 > --- a/plugins/spamassassin > +++ b/plugins/spamassassin > @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ from the SpamAssassin package. > F<http://www.spamassassin.org> > > SpamAssassin 2.6 or newer is required. > > +Stores the results in a note named spamass (for other plugins). The note > +format is 3 fields joined with a colon: is_spam:score:autolearn > + > =head1 CONFIG > > Configured in the plugins file without any parameters, the > @@ -243,6 +246,12 @@ sub insert_spam_headers { > next; # Mail::Header mangles this prefolded header > # $self->log(LOGDEBUG, $new_headers->{$name} ); > }; > + if ( $name eq 'X-Spam-Status' ) { > + my ( $is_spam,undef,$score,$autolearn ) = $new_headers->{$name} > + =~ /^(yes|no), > (score|hits)=([\d\.\-]+)\s.*?autolearn=([\w]+)/i; > + $self->log(LOGINFO, "SA: $is_spam; $score; $autolearn"); > + $transaction->notes('spamass', "$is_spam:$score:$autolearn"); > > As in the other change, 'spamass' is unnecessary abbreviated. What's the > benefit over spamassassin? No reason at all. I've changed it and pushed to github. Matt
