> I also changed the per-user feature to only take effect if the
> message has a single recipient.

Perhaps it would be useful to give people the option of only accepting one
recipient per SMTP transaction?  This seems a bit messy/inefficient, we
don't do it ourselves, but I've heard from at least one QP user with a big
installation that has had success with this; anything after the first
(accepted) recipient is simply deferred, so the sending MTA is forced to
send messages to multiple recipients with one transaction per recipient. 
This would allow people to always take advantage of per-user spam rules,
if they wished.  I should note that our installation does institute a
higher recipient limit (since we queue once per recipient we were running
into problems with client timeouts being reached while waiting for our
response to the DATA command...) and sending MTA's have generally obeyed
this, but it has generated some questions from sending organizations as
their queued take a little longer to empty out, especially in the case
where our clients are doing outbound filtering.  ...Actually, if it was
also possible to turn of SA scanning on relay-allowed transactions, then
it would perhaps be reasonable to make it a one-inbound-recipient limit
rather than simply a one-recipient limit.  For inbound mail it's much less
common to have a whole lot of recipients in a single transactions.

-Jared

Reply via email to