And by that, I mean..
I'm not sure I *object*, because there *are* blacklists we trust... but in general, I think we try and avoid doing things that could cause people to lose mail unintentionally. So I think I lean slightly towards the "consistent defaults of header tagging" side. -R Robert Spier wrote: > > > How about instead of hardcoding this, make deny be the default in the > sample config? > > -R > > Jared Johnson wrote: > > > > Would anyone object to setting the default action to 'deny' on certain > > reliable low-fp URIBL lists? Probably Spamhaus SBL-XBL and DBL and URIBL > > Black. It seems like a new user turning on uribl checks would expect them > > to do something more than adding headers, as long as the services it > > rejects for are reliable. But this also means that anyone who was already > > using the plugin without setting any actions would see a change in > > behavior on upgrade. > > > > -Jared > >
