Thanks, I've reformatted it a little bit and comitted it as 2491f63f069aaf708d5f1980a08a10a7f43d6f70, and have asked Ask to pull it into the main repository.
-R Tom Callahan wrote: > > Oops, disregard that, I was silly. Too much copy paste with not > enough attention paid to what I was doing ;) > > Please let me know if this one looks better (I tested it, it too works > and should fail more gracefully). > > Thanks, > > Tom > > Tom Callahan wrote: > > I just did the minimal modification to get it working with the new > > p0f API (it does indeed work for me); theoretically it should be > > roughly as complete as the old p0f plugin. In the interests of > > completeness I'll fix it up and send in a better version though. > > Thanks, > > Tom > > Robert Spier wrote: > >> Thanks Tom, but did you test this? It might work, but failure cases > >> aren't going to. > >> > >> It references log_err and cleanup:, neither of which exist. > >> > >> (Turns out the whole plugin needs some rewriting to fail better, it > >> has some dies that need removing.) > >> > >> Tom Callahan wrote: > >>> I think it was discussed on list some time ago that the p0f plugin no > >>> longer worked with new versions of p0f but no one pushed the new plugin > >>> version out to the list and/or updated it in git. Attached version has > >>> been modified based on the more recent version of pofq.pl and so should > >>> work. > >>> > >>> Tom > > >
