While I agree that 'DECLINED' is confusing, 'NEXT' isn't terribly clear either.
I think I'd just stick with the status quo. You get used to it pretty quick. -R Jared Johnson wrote: > > A number of my associates who have had occasion to review my QP plugin > code have been perplexed by our use of DECLINED to denote that the > plugin is declining to make a decision about the message -- rather > than to denote, for instance, that the plugin wants us to decline the > message. I have to agree that this is a somewhat unclear bit of > language. Hence this patch, which is the result of wcgrep DECLINED > trunk/ | xargs sed -i "s/DECLINED/NEXT/g" -- _except_ that it > preserves proper alignment in README.plugins and, of course, preserves > backward compatibility with DECLINED. > > We did note that NEXT might call perl's NEXT module for method > redispatch into remembrance for some. There's no technical collision, > though, and the two usages are quite obviously stylistically distinct; > much more obvious than the subtleties of DECLINED. I hope you find > this useful :) > > -Jared
