All this talk of trademarks is pointless. If you want to respect DJB's
contribution, don't name it qmail, period. You don't have any legal
obligation to, but there's a pretty strong moral obligation. Not to
mention that it would be quite confusing for someone to start releasing
a package called "qmail" - we'd have qmail (from djb), net-qmail, and
qmail (new release) or something like that. If you want to hack on it,
just call it qmail-new or something totally different. Problem solved.

Regards,
Brian Szymanski

-- 
Brian Szymanski
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to