-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Guy Hulbert wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 13:18 -0500, Matt Sergeant wrote: >> On 30-Nov-07, at 11:58 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> Is the license change on qmail likely to change the direction of >>> qpsmtpd? >> Doubtful. Qpsmtpd wasn't written because of a dislike of the license.
And there are quite a lot of us that don't run qmail at all. Personally I use qpsmtpd as it provides a powerful, central location to configure access, anti-spam and anti-virus controls. My backend is Postfix though and I don't use qmail anywhere. Regards James Turnbull - -- James Turnbull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - --- Author of Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/) Hardening Linux (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/) - --- PGP Key (http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x0C42DF40) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHUUxR9hTGvAxC30ARAuBcAJ418ZwNKgtCIYvigi07QotyKZEoywCgrwXF mWLvaOnAqZ9ob9ofQgdm6AA= =R7T/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
