On 2007-08-31 13:44:44 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > >On 2007-08-31 10:42:37 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote: > >127.0.0.1 is a problem even after establishing the connection: With > >"normal" routing arrangements the remote IP address will be 127.0.0.1, > >too, so the only variable is the remote port. > > Just to clarify, you are referring to SMTP connections from other > processes local to the qpsmtpd server, i.e. connecting over loopback. > Correct?
Yes.
> Yes, I can see that in that case 127.0.0.1:nnn:127.0.0.1:25 would not
> identify the host and would not be unique across multiple servers.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | I know I'd be respectful of a pirate
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | with an emu on his shoulder.
| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Sam in "Freefall"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
