Andrew Pam wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:05:46AM -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
I'm not sure this is correct. Sometimes we do care what other SA instances thought. Like when we're comparing two servers. Or just in general.
I agree that loss of information is normally bad, but when it is untrustworthy (since there is no signature), how is preserving it going to help in the general case?
I agree. Of course it is important to only trust the X-Spam-Status header
added by the local SpamAssassin, but that does not require removing other
headers which may still be informative.
...and possibly forged. If your MUA is filtering based on the X-Spam-Score header, how do you tell it which one to pay attention to (I am not aware of anything outside of a procedural filter like mailproc which could determine which SA instance added which filter).
How about making it an option to the SA plugin then? You set it, it replaces the headers; you don't set it, the new headers are added?
John
