Hello,

Friday, August 20, 2004, 2:02:16 PM, Mark Powell wrote:
> I take it that ./qpsmtpd is just a left over from the previous run setup?

you are absolutely right, it's the ol' copy/paste bug.

> Or does that do something?

it just sits there ;)

> Yeah, that is a problem I didn't want to tackle. Even though running extra
> qpsmtpd instances just for the other ports seemed to be overkill, it seems
> the easiest way.

If I understand correctly, whe using PPerl on SSL connections it simply uses
the child processes created for the non-ssl clients. At least seems so for
me. The stunnel is just only a wrapper (kind of) but uses say "normal"
qpsmtpd processes. Interesting a little ;)

> I haven't seen that error although we have only had a handful of these
> connections so far.

It appears after every connection. (Update: uh, oh, got it now - it's MUA,
it's probably borken somwehow. I've tried another MUA and there's no error)

> Maybe something to do with the stunnel build, here's
> mine:

and this is what I got (it's from .deb package, I'll try to build it myself
- update: it doesn't help - see above)

# stunnel -version
stunnel 4.05 on i386-pc-linux-gnu PTHREAD+LIBWRAP with OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004

Global options
cert            = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem
ciphers         = ALL:!ADH:+RC4:@STRENGTH
debug           = 5
key             = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem
pid             = /var/run/stunnel4/stunnel.pid
RNDbytes        = 64
RNDfile         = /dev/urandom
RNDoverwrite    = yes
session         = 300 seconds
verify          = none

Service-level options
TIMEOUTbusy     = 300 seconds
TIMEOUTclose    = 60 seconds
TIMEOUTidle     = 43200 seconds

> We have a need for both smtp over ssl and smtp with tls to support
> different clients. I decided to run these on ports 465 and 587
> respectively. I made a quick mod so that my authldap plugin is only used
> on these encrypted ports and not at all on port 25.

they are the same as mine, basically. although I don't se the difference
between the starttls and smtp-ssl services (except they run on different
ports ;) but it could be just my eyes.

Anyway, thanks for sharing the info.

-- 
spaze -- exploited.cz -- tojeono.cz
- forget everything and remember! -

Reply via email to