This is now a real issue where emails are being rejected.
@40000000674ff0d52b51d60c qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)):
MAILFROM:<harley.c...@egopharm.com> RCPTTO:syd...@ycs.com.au
Happens to gmail in particular.
Has anyone any ideas? I went to remove rpsamd but it linked to
so many other items.
Any help greatly appreciated.
regards
Tony White
On 24/11/24 19:57, Tony White wrote:
Hi Folks,
i am seeing this is my smtp current log.
@400000006742e92414d4c574 simscan:[1493123]:CLEAN
(0.00/0.00):5.4580s:=?iso-8859-1?Q?FW__Cr=E9=E9_en_1932_!!!?=:40.107.107.184:m...@siger.com.au:mpoin...@ycs.com.au
@400000006742e92416ee8584
@400000006742e92416ee8584 (rspamc:1493131): GLib-ERROR **: 19:51:38.384:
gmem.c:170: failed to allocate 16777216 bytes
@400000006742e92416ee896c Stack trace (most recent call last):
@400000006742e92416ee896c #12 Object "", at 0xffffffffffffffff, in
@400000006742e92416f06214 #11 Object "/usr/bin/rspamc", at 0x55f58611764d, in
@400000006742e92416f7248c #10 Object "/lib64/libc.so.6", at 0x7f4d99cad7e4,
in __libc_start_main
@400000006742e92416f7248c #9 Object "/usr/bin/rspamc", at 0x55f586115def, in
@400000006742e92416f72874 #8 Object "/usr/bin/rspamc", at 0x55f58611e1bf, in
@400000006742e92416f72874 #7 Object "/usr/bin/rspamc", at 0x55f58613507b, in
@400000006742e92416f72c5c #6 Object "/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0", at
0x7f4d9f42d4a0, in g_string_set_size
@400000006742e92416f7824c #5 Object "/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0", at
0x7f4d9f42d216, in
@400000006742e92416f893bc #4 Object "/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0", at
0x7f4d9f4106ce, in g_realloc
@400000006742e92416f991a4 #3 Object "/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0", at
0x7f4d9f411ed2, in g_log
@400000006742e92416f9cc3c #2 Object "/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0", at
0x7f4d9f411cec, in g_logv
@400000006742e92416fac254 #1 Object "/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0", at
0x7f4d9f411ab0, in g_log_default_handler
@400000006742e92416fb721c #0 Object "/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0", at
0x7f4d9f410a05, in
@400000006742e92416fba4e4 Trace/breakpoint trap (Signal sent by the kernel 0 0)
Is this a problem with ram allocation ie increase the run values for smp?
TIA :)
