If you must have a catch all, I would go with option 2. With option 1's quota, + or -.
--- Sincerely, - Fabian S. On 2014-05-19 09:15, Jim Shupert wrote: > Friends, > > 1st let me say that i have asked this forum for advice on my battele with > spam and I can say that I am enjoying success from the wisdom. > thank you. > > a related matter. > > I [ the postmaster ] personnally get a lot of spam because I am the ctach all > account. > this means I get spam for ' people who do not exist" - this is 2 catagories. > 1- accounts that did exist in the past but no longer. ie billiebob left - so > no [email protected] anymore > 2- accounts that have never existed . ie [email protected] > > as you might suspect these are largely spam. > > My q - what is a suggested means of doing this? > my thoughts are > 1. a account is made named [email protected] as catch all and assign it a quota > of 5 MB > 2 make [email protected] the catch all. > or > 3. no change - meaning leave it so it goes to my mailbox as catch all. > > thanks
