On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 03:36:02PM +0000, MarkD wrote:
[snip]
> It'll be interesting to see how you propose to atomically make such
> queue changes while incurring a worthwhile queueing cost saving.

I have no such proposal. I just feel that with some changes to the
queueing structure, this might be feasible. On a 100mbyte mail, this
saves reading+writing 100mbyte when a mail is forwarded.

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html

Reply via email to