On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:56:06PM +0200, Filip Salomonsson wrote: > Me: > > Sure. But while it's there, why not make it as useful as possible? I'm not > > saying that there's anything wrong with the way Delivered-To lines are > > written today. I'm only suggesting something that I think would > > be a better solution. > > Let me withdraw that comment. Delivered-To is obviously not the appropriate > header for showing the envelope recipient. I don't know what I was thinking. > Sorry. You were thinking the exactly same thing that I was when I first encountered this header. I think that showing the envelope recipient per default would have been "a good thing". Possible through patching, of course. /magnus -- http://x42.com/
- A real "bouncesaying" Johan Almqvist
- Re: A real "bouncesaying" Johan Almqvist
- Re: A real "bouncesaying" Peter van Dijk
- Re: A real "bouncesaying" Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: A real "bouncesaying" Filip Salomonsson
- Re: A real "bouncesaying" Peter van Dijk
- Re: A real "bouncesaying"... Filip Salomonsson
- Re: A real "bouncesaying&... Peter van Dijk
- Re: A real "bouncesay... Filip Salomonsson
- Re: A real "bouncesay... Filip Salomonsson
- Re: A real "bouncesay... Magnus Bodin
- Re: A real "bouncesaying&... Dave Sill
- Re: A real "bouncesay... Filip Salomonsson
- Re: A real "bouncesaying" Felix von Leitner
- Re: A real "bouncesaying" Johan Almqvist
- erorr when patch --verbose -p1 < /tmp/bi... Sid Wilroy
- Should I worry about these compile warnings... Sid Wilroy
- Re: Should I worry about these compile ... Daniel Kelley
- Re: Should I worry about these compile ... Charles Cazabon
