qmail Digest 7 May 2001 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1357

Topics (messages 62012 through 62034):

Multiple user with vpopmail
        62012 by: Sebastien VIEILLARD

Re: dialup setup
        62013 by: Gavin McCord
        62015 by: Robin S. Socha
        62019 by: Chris Corbettis
        62021 by: Chris Corbettis

sender Domain
        62014 by: Clemens Hermann

rcpthosts default allow all ?
        62016 by: D. Cook
        62017 by: David Talkington
        62018 by: Greg White
        62020 by: D. Cook
        62022 by: Adam McKenna

Re: POP3 Cluster
        62023 by: Karsten W. Rohrbach
        62032 by: Russ Allbery

Migrating qmail between hosts
        62024 by: Mike Hodson

Newbie
        62025 by: peter.milburn.sofcom.com.au
        62026 by: Rick Updegrove

mails not deleing
        62027 by: QmailList
        62029 by: Robin S. Socha
        62030 by: Jason Brooke
        62031 by: Frank Tegtmeyer

unscribution
        62028 by: ms7.url.com.tw

Re: Can MX record be CNAME?
        62033 by: Peter Peltonen
        62034 by: Peter van Dijk

Administrivia:

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To bug my human owner, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----------------------------------------------------------------------


I'am an isp and i want to use vpopmail for any site installed on server.

The problem is that any site have one specific unix user. and of course, any user have 
a limited quota.

But vpopmail create mailbox for only one unix user (vpopmail user by default).
Is anybody know, what i can do to have each mailbox ~vpopmail/domains/domainename, 
under specific unix user.

thx






On 2001.05.05 22:37 Chris Corbettis wrote:
> Can anyone here point me to some documentation on setting up
> qmail+fetchmail over a dialup line?
> I know this is quite simple; I found a decent howto on Google's cache
> (the original not being available) some time ago and it worked perfectly.
> It covered everything I needed, installing qmail and it's required 
> programs, creating pppdir, ip-up.local etc.
> Frankly looking at the LDP HOWTO is worse than useless.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Chris Corbettis
> 

www.lifewithqmail.org

The qmail.org site is not short of links either.


-- 
I'm Keyser Soze...No, I'm Keyser Soze. I'm Keyser Soze and so's my wife!
(Monty Python play The Usual Suspects.)




* Gavin McCord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010506 08:23]:
> On 2001.05.05 22:37 Chris Corbettis wrote:
> > Can anyone here point me to some documentation on setting up
> > qmail+fetchmail over a dialup line?

> www.lifewithqmail.org

... points to http://cr.yp.to/serialmail.html which is not exactly
overly helpful in setting serialmail up :-)

> The qmail.org site is not short of links either.

TOISP and FROMISP in the source tarball should do. IMVHO they should be
renamed to INSTALL.TOISP... ;-)




Robin S. Socha wrote:

> * Gavin McCord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010506 08:23]:
> 
>> On 2001.05.05 22:37 Chris Corbettis wrote:
>> 
>>> Can anyone here point me to some documentation on setting up
>>> qmail+fetchmail over a dialup line?
>> 
>> www.lifewithqmail.org
> 
> 
> .... points to http://cr.yp.to/serialmail.html which is not exactly
> overly helpful in setting serialmail up :-)
> 
>> The qmail.org site is not short of links either.
> 
> 
> TOISP and FROMISP in the source tarball should do. IMVHO they should be
> renamed to INSTALL.TOISP... ;-)
> 
> 
> 
useless - really, most of that stuff is for someone setting up a server 
environment.
And yes, qmail.org is short of links, look at it again and maybe search 
through for the keywords, "PPP", "DIALUP"!

Someone wrote up a 1 page guide just solely for dialup (ppp) usage, you 
know, just to set it up, I'll read up on the whole man page stuff some 
other day.

Back to Google it is then...

Chris





Robin S. Socha wrote:

> * Gavin McCord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010506 08:23]:
> 
>> On 2001.05.05 22:37 Chris Corbettis wrote:
>> 
>>> Can anyone here point me to some documentation on setting up
>>> qmail+fetchmail over a dialup line?
>> 
>> www.lifewithqmail.org
> 
> 
> .... points to http://cr.yp.to/serialmail.html which is not exactly
> overly helpful in setting serialmail up :-)
> 
>> The qmail.org site is not short of links either.
> 
> 
> TOISP and FROMISP in the source tarball should do. IMVHO they should be
> renamed to INSTALL.TOISP... ;-)
> 
> 
> 

Seconds later -

http://www.logicalshift.org.uk/unix/internet/

Under the title "Offline mailing"

Now I have to ask why isn't this information linked to from qmail.org? 
somebody, please link it!
Is it that unreasonable to ask for just the bare facts to getting qmail 
setup for a simple workstation? I don't think so, personally I could 
care less about the minutae, just as long as it works and works elegantly.

Again, someone please link to this page from the qmail.org, I only just 
managed to find it after hours of fruitless searching and I'm sure I'm 
not alone.

Thanks

Chris





HI,

is there a way to only accept Mails that have one of my local/virtual Domains
either as sender or as recepient? I do not want to make relaying based
on this because I use smtp-auth and there it is possible to send mails
to otherdomain1.tld as sender otherdomain2.tld. 
I just want to prevent people who have a valid account from using my server 
to send mails with different adresses than the one that are hosted from me.

tia

/ch




Hi all,

I can't find the syntax for /var/qmail/control in the manual.  Please
bear with me.

What's the syntax for allowing all by default in rcpthosts and only
selected hosts are banned?  Something like
allow all
reject *.online-sex.com

Thanks.





-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


D. Cook wrote:

>I can't find the syntax for /var/qmail/control in the manual.  Please
>bear with me.

'man qmail-control' will point you in the right direction.

>What's the syntax for allowing all by default in rcpthosts and only
>selected hosts are banned?  Something like allow all reject
>*.online-sex.com

I personally find Hoffmann's spamcontrol patch to be much more
flexible in this regard: http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/qmail_en.html.
It adds a wealth of options, including new /control files, and even
updated man pages.

G'luck.  -d

- -- 
David Talkington
http://www.spotnet.org

PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/dt000823.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQEVAwUBOvV1lr1ZYOtSwT+tAQHfzQf8DEg6Dipw9vnuVGHgtVd/h/hFLoft294f
WcDOMMciZQSdgtxscA6+h4MeiGihy56T8MmAWVrLsM3Z4uFDE0w4jUcc9Yd5GUys
v+FiXk/VHTIyxMwqIjesMKmJlrtb0hkqcJbZOBm1rBgmyQnAZaEKvFMo45NJfP+n
7CfTy/SLScjL6BzbFSTJAp+atJ0ARuDM26efkClCNkn4Qh6bCwrLfb80L5oEnz6A
4rjO5Pz3yXiYKzmf/Rq7PeFK1VVUxCvCJKJBUmiq+n58mOjuANUWks6Ajmy75Zsw
z3MzWNPFalYI/VCTGuChwsO2PQcx6kyEvHuGkyhUWydIoHgRUM4IHQ==
=MD2o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 08:42:10AM -0700, D . Cook wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I can't find the syntax for /var/qmail/control in the manual.  Please
> bear with me.

As said, try 'man qmail-control'.
> 
> What's the syntax for allowing all by default in rcpthosts and only
> selected hosts are banned?  Something like
> allow all
> reject *.online-sex.com

Are you really sure this is what you want to do? Setting up a domain in
rcpthosts means 'I want to recieve mail _for_ this domain', not 'I want
to recieve mail _from_ this domain'. If one could actually set up
rcpthosts the way you are asking, you would be placed in ORBS and RSS
faster than you could say 'open relay'. This is a Very Bad Idea(tm).

If you need assistance with selective relay, start here:

http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/servers.html#authorized-relay

You can 'ban' the sites you want by IP address using ':deny' in place of
':allow' in tcprules. You can ban specific envelope senders with
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom. There are also some spamcontrol patches,
see:

http://www.qmail.org/qmail/top.html#spam

> 
> Thanks.
> 
NP. I noticed the first reply to your message mentioned the spamcontrol
patches, but did not point out the implied error in your thinking.
Please feel free to flame away if I misunderstood your question, but it
does imply a misunderstanding of the nature of 'rcpthosts' and selective
relay. HTH,


-- 
Greg White
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent
revolution inevitable.
                -- John F. Kennedy




Oops. I actually wanted only to be able to send mails OUT to every host
except what is banned.  I failed to grep control man page to understand
what is required to accomplish above.  I only found out by specifying
the domain in rcpthosts I could send mails to that domain.  Could you
please point out the exact what-to-do in man page?  Thank you.

qmail-control(5)   Headers, Tables, and Macros   qmail-control(5)

NAME
     qmail-control - qmail configuration files

INTRODUCTION
     You can change the behavior of the qmail system by modifying
     qmail's control files in /var/qmail/control.

     qmail can survive with just one control file, me, containing
     the  fully-qualified name of the current host.  This file is
     used as  the  default  for  other  hostname-related  control
     files.

     Comments are allowed in  badmailfrom,  locals,  percenthack,
     rcpthosts,  smtproutes, and virtualdomains.  Trailing spaces
     and tabs are allowed in any control file.

     The following table lists all control files other  than  me.
     See the corresponding man pages for further details.

          control             default            used by

          badmailfrom         (none)             qmail-smtpd
          bouncefrom          MAILER-DAEMON      qmail-send
          bouncehost          me                 qmail-send
          concurrencylocal    10                 qmail-send
          concurrencyremote   20                 qmail-send
          defaultdomain       me                 qmail-inject
          defaulthost         me                 qmail-inject
          doublebouncehost    me                 qmail-send
          doublebounceto      postmaster         qmail-send
          envnoathost         me                 qmail-send
          helohost            me                 qmail-remote
          idhost              me                 qmail-inject
          localiphost         me                 qmail-smtpd
          locals              me                 qmail-send
          percenthack         (none)             qmail-send
          plusdomain          me                 qmail-inject
          queuelifetime       604800             qmail-send
          rcpthosts           (none)             qmail-smtpd
          recipientmap        (none)             qmail-send
          smtpgreeting        me                 qmail-smtpd
          smtproutes          (none)             qmail-remote
          timeoutconnect      60                 qmail-remote
          timeoutremote       1200               qmail-remote
          timeoutsmtpd        1200               qmail-smtpd
          virtualdomains      (none)             qmail-send

SEE ALSO
     qmail-inject(8),  qmail-remote(8),   qmail-send(8),   qmail-
     showctl(8), qmail-smtpd(8)




On Sun, 6 May 2001 09:54:11 -0700
Greg White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 08:42:10AM -0700, D . Cook wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I can't find the syntax for /var/qmail/control in the manual.  Please
> > bear with me.
> 
> As said, try 'man qmail-control'.
> > 
> > What's the syntax for allowing all by default in rcpthosts and only
> > selected hosts are banned?  Something like
> > allow all
> > reject *.online-sex.com
> 
> Are you really sure this is what you want to do? Setting up a domain in
> rcpthosts means 'I want to recieve mail _for_ this domain', not 'I want
> to recieve mail _from_ this domain'. If one could actually set up
> rcpthosts the way you are asking, you would be placed in ORBS and RSS
> faster than you could say 'open relay'. This is a Very Bad Idea(tm).
> 
> If you need assistance with selective relay, start here:
> 
> http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/servers.html#authorized-relay
> 
> You can 'ban' the sites you want by IP address using ':deny' in place of
> ':allow' in tcprules. You can ban specific envelope senders with
> /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom. There are also some spamcontrol patches,
> see:
> 
> http://www.qmail.org/qmail/top.html#spam
> 
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> NP. I noticed the first reply to your message mentioned the spamcontrol
> patches, but did not point out the implied error in your thinking.
> Please feel free to flame away if I misunderstood your question, but it
> does imply a misunderstanding of the nature of 'rcpthosts' and selective
> relay. HTH,
> 
> 
> -- 
> Greg White
> Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent
> revolution inevitable.
>                 -- John F. Kennedy






On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:40:16AM -0700, D. Cook wrote:
> Oops. I actually wanted only to be able to send mails OUT to every host
> except what is banned.  I failed to grep control man page to understand
> what is required to accomplish above.  I only found out by specifying
> the domain in rcpthosts I could send mails to that domain.  Could you
> please point out the exact what-to-do in man page?  Thank you.
> 
> qmail-control(5)   Headers, Tables, and Macros   qmail-control(5)

Qmail doesn't do what you want to do.  If you do what you say you intend to
do, you will effectively make your host an open relay.  This is NOT the way
to control spam with qmail.  Various ways of controlling spam with qmail are
already very well documented, so stop spamming the list with stupid
questions and copies of the man pages.

--Adam

-- 
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "No matter how much it changes, 
http://flounder.net/publickey.html   |  technology's just a bunch of wires 
GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA        |  connected to a bunch of other wires."
     38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A        |  Joe Rogan, _NewsRadio_
 12:19pm  up 4 day(s), 11:12,  6 users,  load average: 0.02, 0.02, 0.02




Steve Kennedy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.05 19:08:32 +0000:
> You could also use EMC storage as a back-end, not cheap but very
> flexible and reliable.
emc is good as long as it runs. if some pice fails those boxes are gonna
fsck forever...
/k


-- 
> Sex is the poor man's opera.  -- G. B. Shaw
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de
[Key] [KeyID---] [Created-] [Fingerprint-------------------------------------]
GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE  DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46




Karsten W Rohrbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Kennedy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.05 19:08:32 +0000:

>> You could also use EMC storage as a back-end, not cheap but very
>> flexible and reliable.

> emc is good as long as it runs. if some pice fails those boxes are gonna
> fsck forever...

Huh?  What are you talking about?

About the only drawback to EMC is that it's insanely expensive.  And I
really mean it when I say insane.  It's incredibly reliable, though;
dual-redundant systems from end to end, at least in the Symmetrix.  (The
Clarion products are very different and not really the same sort of
storage.)

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>




Hello
I am undertaking a project to migrate my domain (mystica.cx) between 2 servers.
What are the recommended steps (aside from compilation / configuration of
qmail/vpopmail/courier imap,  on the second server)to preserve emails and not
lose any in the process? I use imap almost exclusively, but other users use
pop3 for email. The domain is a vpopmail virtual domain on the first server,
so can I just tar/bz2 up the hosting dir, or should I load rsync for the next
few days to keep any mail that shows up on the first server going to the second
while DNS propagates?

Any hints will be helpful
Thanks

-- 
Mike Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





Hey all, I am trying to get qmail to work with MRTG, I am at a complete 
loss here
 I have qmail runing with daemon tools, at present I have to qmail 
servers, with the qmail log being sent to one machine, do I need to run 
qmailanalog on each machine.

If anyone can help, it would be great, 

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Milburn 
Systems Manager 
Software Communication Group Ltd 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 
Level 16, 644 Chapel St 
South Yarra, Vic 3141 
www.sofcom.com.au 
******************************************** 
This message contains privileged and confidential information intended 
only 
for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended 
recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any 
action 
in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please 
notify Software Communication Group immediately. 
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender 
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of 
Software 
Communication Group. 
******************************************** 










----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:53 PM
Subject: Newbie


> Hey all, I am trying to get qmail to work with MRTG, I am at a complete
> loss here
> If anyone can help, it would be great,

https://mail.socha.net/stats/  has a downloadable mrtg.cfg file if that helps.
I used it : )

Rick Up





 
 
Hi All there
 
 
I am using qmail+vpopmail on RH 6.2 linux with Maildir
 
I want how mail client are treated when conneting to qmail pop server
 
Because my pop client are complaining of ,Their mails are not get delete
 
when the internet connection is loss while downloading the mail and all the
 
mail comes again when they reconnect,
 
Kindly help me out of it
 
Regards
 
 




* QmailList <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010507 00:18]:

Your mail is quite annoyingly formatted: http://learn.to/edit_messages/.

>   I am using qmail+vpopmail on RH 6.2 linux with Maildir 
> 
>   I want how mail client are treated when conneting to qmail pop server

Depends on the client software used. Imagine the following:

mutt:           "Hi, qmail-pop3d, it's me..."
qmail-pop3d:    "Hi there, here, have some mail..."

OTOH, using Neanderthal Technology, the following dialogue is also
possible:

Outlook Express: "We are Mircosoft of Borg. Your standards will be
                  assimilated. RFCs are futile."
qmail-pop3d:     "RTFM, luser... *PLONK*"

>   Because my pop client are complaining of ,Their mails are not get delete
> 
>   when the internet connection is loss while downloading the mail and all the
> 
>   mail comes again when they reconnect,

What exactly did you expect? Do you want to delete mail that has not yet
been downloaded?




> Your mail is quite annoyingly formatted: http://learn.to/edit_messages/.

poor baby
keep crying those mailing list tears - I'm sure you really do believe you're
doing your part


> Outlook Express: "We are Mircosoft of Borg. Your standards will be
>                   assimilated. RFCs are futile."
> qmail-pop3d:     "RTFM, luser... *PLONK*"

Every copy of Outlook Express I've used collects email from qmail-pop3d just
fine. Maybe I should try gnus? a-frobnicating into the apparently
in-grokkable(?) we shall go

jason







"QmailList" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> when the internet connection is loss while downloading the mail and all the
> mail comes again when they reconnect,

This is the correct behaviour. Mail will be deleted when the client
sends the QUIT command to the server. If the connection is lost before
the mails will still be there.
Your clients may set up their POP clients so, that they only download
unread mail, so they don't get duplicates. This still leaves the mail
at the server (bad for you) and it slows down the downloading
process. This is not good for flaky connections.

Possibly you should provide compressed UUCP transfers with batch sizes
below 5k. This could be more reliable.

Regards, Frank










Markus Stumpf wrote:

> The funny thing about this whole thread is that the source of all
> problems is probably a lousy provider, that doesn't care for PTR
> delegations. So why don't you get yourself a caring one?

Actually, they do care about them, but aren't that happy to make them. And I
don't like to be dependent on them and would like to fix things myself.

Here is another question to keep this hilarous thread alive:

Is there any relationship with the MX record and qmail's control/me variable.
If they are different, will it cause any trouble? I suppose not, but one can
never be sure enough...

Regards,
Peter




On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:04:52AM +0300, Peter Peltonen wrote:
[snip]
> Here is another question to keep this hilarous thread alive:

Please stop this thread.

> Is there any relationship with the MX record and qmail's control/me variable.
> If they are different, will it cause any trouble? I suppose not, but one can
> never be sure enough...

There is no relation. This is a feature.

Greetz, Peter.


Reply via email to