With my respect to everyone on this list. I *really* feel some guys here
think they are better than others. I don't think so. They can be more
experienced in some tools they could never build alone.
I beg Hogan's agreement to make mine his words, and suggest some guys to set
up an autoresponder to this list saying: "Read the FAQs and do your
homework". You aren't gods...
I've had many difficulties trying to understand this wonderful and *very*
poorly documented mail environment (qmail + tools), even with my systems
expertise and C knowledge. I had to read the source code many times to
discover some simple issues that ARE NOT IN ANY FUCKING FAQ.
"The BEST" who think shoudn't "feed bla-bla-bla", why don't you just ignore
and simply don't answer those "ridiculous" questions?
Goodbye, guys. I'll leave your Olimpus now.
>
> you know, i've had about enough of you guys... on and off the
> list... please don't email me anymore... i will be unsubscribing
> this morning
>
> i would be the first to admit that i'm not the 'guru' that you
> guys are... i've spent the last four full days trying to figure
> out qmail/tcpserver/qpopper/ezmlm and procmail - mostly because i
> thought that the open-source community was cool and helpful - you
> know TEAMWORK? - i have found that documentation is poorly
> written and poorly organized
>
> since i joined this list, i have gotten nothing but grief for my
> questions... i would estimate that i have printed/read over 200
> pages of documentation on the various source packages, patches,
> add-ons and cetera that i have had to install...
>
> you would think that a few guys who know all there is to know
> wouldn't mind helping out the new guy on the block - boy, was i
> wrong - seems like the main function of the list is to distribute
> the links to faqs or more documentation
>
> i am sorry to have troubled you all... i would have liked to
> progress to your level... now, i realize that there's nothing to envy
>
> adios
>
> - hogan
>
> >On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:53:01AM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
> >> i'm sorry to have trouble you... for future reference, what
> sort of question
> >> would qualify for your enlightened views?
> >
> >Perhaps one that you couldn't answer yourself with a minimum of effort.
> >
> >Chris
>
> _________________________________________________________ Do You
> Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
