>>> for future reference, what sort of question would qualify for your
>enlightened views? <<
>
>
>Probably NO QUESTION!
you know, i've had about enough of you guys... on and off the list... please don't
email me anymore... i will be unsubscribing this morning
i would be the first to admit that i'm not the 'guru' that you guys are... i've spent
the last four full days trying to figure out qmail/tcpserver/qpopper/ezmlm and
procmail - mostly because i thought that the open-source community was cool and
helpful - you know TEAMWORK? - i have found that documentation is poorly written and
poorly organized
since i joined this list, i have gotten nothing but grief for my questions... i would
estimate that i have printed/read over 200 pages of documentation on the various
source packages, patches, add-ons and cetera that i have had to install...
you would think that a few guys who know all there is to know wouldn't mind helping
out the new guy on the block - boy, was i wrong - seems like the main function of the
list is to distribute the links to faqs or more documentation
i am sorry to have troubled you all... i would have liked to progress to your level...
now, i realize that there's nothing to envy
adios
- hogan
>On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:53:01AM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
>> i'm sorry to have trouble you... for future reference, what sort of question
>> would qualify for your enlightened views?
>
>Perhaps one that you couldn't answer yourself with a minimum of effort.
>
>Chris
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
