David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > With or without big-todo, you risk ending up with a f*cking big todo
> > queue after that. Switching off todo-handling for a while,
> > automatically, sounds like a *very* bad idea to me.
>
> Why is a fscking big todo queue any worse than a fscking big queue?
> The current system of favoring todo processing over sending out mail
> seems to rather bite.
Indeed, the current handling of todo tends to turn a busy qmail queue into
a LIFO setup -- would not favouring the current contents of the queue
over todo (turning it into a FIFO) make more sense?
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
