Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1)

[Scott Gifford]

Keary Suska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This would definitely be a bug of concern--even sendmail (yoiks!) knows how
> to handle 0.0.0.0. But shouldn't qmail bounce the message as a possible MX
> loop?

  It should, but does not.  Putting it into ipme would cause it to.

  See my original post that triggered this, at:

      http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/qmail0101/326.html

-----ScottG.