qmail Digest 22 Dec 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 1221

Topics (messages 54322 through 54344):

help!! percenthack??
        54322 by: Thomas Ackermann
        54323 by: Alex Pennace
        54324 by: Cyril Bitterich
        54332 by: David Dyer-Bennet
        54333 by: Thomas Arnold

Re: Source RPM
        54325 by: Charles Cazabon
        54330 by: Ryszard Lach

Re: Problem when starting qmail.
        54326 by: Charles Cazabon

Re: can't remove relay-ctrl
        54327 by: Charles Cazabon
        54329 by: Charles Cazabon

Re: user with no Maildir
        54328 by: Charles Cazabon

vhosts
        54331 by: Kurth Bemis
        54335 by: Chris Johnson
        54336 by: Kurth Bemis
        54337 by: Mark Delany

Virtual Domain equivalent problem
        54334 by: Mike Jackson
        54338 by: Turbo Fredriksson

link for qmail users at abuse.net (was: help!! percenthack??)
        54339 by: Aaron L. Meehan

Re: SUMMARY: Amavis + MySQL on Qmail :)
        54340 by: Stefan Laudat

Qmail local question
        54341 by: Eddy Fafard

Subject
        54342 by: kiran.server.indiainfoline.com
        54343 by: andi

Tool for running Probetest under Solaris!
        54344 by: Michael Maier

Administrivia:

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To bug my human owner, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----------------------------------------------------------------------


> >    >>> RSET
> >    <<< 250 flushed
> >    >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >    <<< 250 ok
> >    >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >    <<< 250 ok
> >
> >   Relay test result
> >
> >    Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
>
> >
>
> so whats up here, thought the percenthack is turned off by defualt if
> the file's not here ??
> help fast!!!
> thx

> Thomas





On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 03:03:33PM +0000, Thomas Ackermann wrote:
> > >    >>> RSET
> > >    <<< 250 flushed
> > >    >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >    <<< 250 ok
> > >    >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >    <<< 250 ok
> > >
> > >   Relay test result
> > >
> > >    Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
> >
> > so whats up here, thought the percenthack is turned off by defualt if
> > the file's not here ??
> > help fast!!!

I give up. Why didn't you bother reading the blinking bold text
underneath that statement?




Hi 

Thomas Ackermann wrote:
> > >   Relay test result
> > >
> > >    Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Would you please be so kind to reread the above line. And you might want
to give a second thought to the meaning of the words "at first glance"
and "appeared". 
(Maybe you'd also like to look them up in a dictionary.)

Cyril




Thomas Ackermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 21 December 2000 at 15:03:55 +0000
 > > >    >>> RSET
 > > >    <<< 250 flushed
 > > >    >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > > >    <<< 250 ok
 > > >    >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > > >    <<< 250 ok
 > > >
 > > >   Relay test result
 > > >
 > > >    Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
 > >
 > > >
 > >
 > > so whats up here, thought the percenthack is turned off by defualt if
 > > the file's not here ??
 > > help fast!!!

To answer in a bit more detail -- percenthack is indeed turned off if
the file isn't there.  If percenthack is turned off, the message is
accepted for delivery to user "relaytest%abuse.net".  It's likely that
you have no such user on your system; if so, the message will be
bounced.  If you do have such a user, it will be delivered to that
user.  In no case, however, will it be relayed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (if percenthack is off). 

What's the very next line of results say?  In the versions I've seen,
the very next line is even more explanation that it won't know if
relaying is going on until the relayed message arrives.
-- 
David Dyer-Bennet      /      Welcome to the future!      /      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/          Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/




Better you read the abuse net's FAQ for the test. Qmail is discarding it
later, so relay checkers like the one from ORBS that check wether the mail
gets really delivered won't put you on the Open Relay List. Abuse.net's
checker doesn't do this.

Mit freundlichen Grüssen

Thomas Arnold
Chief Management Application Services


          #              Ihre Xmedia Agentur:            #
          #          http://www.alea-active.com          #
 
      alea active GmbH            |         fon: 06201 - 90 20 4-0
      Hauptstr. 97-99             |         fax: 06201 - 90 20 4-17
      69 469 Weinheim             |    Leonardo: 06201 - 90 20 4-27
      mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  Fritz-Data: 06201 - 90 20 4-26
      =============================================================

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Cyril Bitterich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2000 15:12
An: Thomas Ackermann
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: help!! percenthack??


Hi 

Thomas Ackermann wrote:
> > >   Relay test result
> > >
> > >    Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Would you please be so kind to reread the above line. And you might want
to give a second thought to the meaning of the words "at first glance"
and "appeared". 
(Maybe you'd also like to look them up in a dictionary.)

Cyril




Davi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> As far as I know, DJB's license allow to build source rpm and distribute it.
> The patches are applied at build time and no binaries is distributed.
> Does someone can tell me if is it ok?

Several people already do this, and Dan has not voiced any objections that
I have heard about.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 08:22:12AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Davi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > As far as I know, DJB's license allow to build source rpm and distribute it.
> > The patches are applied at build time and no binaries is distributed.
> > Does someone can tell me if is it ok?
> 
> Several people already do this, and Dan has not voiced any objections that
> I have heard about.

You're right. Debian has even in section non-free qmail-src binary package
(containing qmail sources) with build-qmail script for automatic binary package
(containg compiled qmail distribution ) provided. 

Regards,

Siaco.

-- 
Ryszard Łach, Internet Designers s.c., Przedmiejska 6-10, 54-201 Wrocław
'echo "" |mail -s "send key pub" [EMAIL PROTECTED]' for my public GPG key




Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [root@sphinx qmail]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail start
> Starting qmail: svscan.
> [root@sphinx qmail]# multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current
> directory: access denied
> 
> I've followed Dave Sill's qmail installation manual.

No. If you had, you wouldn't have a problem.

But this isn't enough information for us to make a definitive diagnosis.
Try posting the contents of /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail _exactly_ -- don't
retype it, use copy & paste or something.

Also, describe _exactly_ how you have installed and configured
daemontools and qmail.  And show us the contents of your service directories
while you're at it, with ownerships and permissions.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rpm -e ucspi-unix-0.34-1
> error: removing these packages would break dependencies:
>         ucspi-unix is needed by qmail-1.03+patches-16
> [root@test bruceg]# rpm -e qmail-1.03+patches-16
> error: removing these packages would break dependencies:
>         qmail >= 1.03+patches is needed by relay-ctrl-2.5-1
> [root@test bruceg]# rpm -e relay-ctrl-2.5-1
> execution of script failed
> 
> what can I do?

Try posting on a relevant mailing list.  Bruce has his "rpms" mailing list
and his "bgware" mailing list, as well as relay-ctrl.  Try asking on one
of those.  You can find the list subscription addresses by visiting his
site at:

http://em.ca/~bruceg/

Charles
Try posting on a relevant mailing list.  Bruce has his "rpms" mailing list
and his "bgware" mailing list, as well as relay-ctrl.  Try asking on one
of those.  You can find the list subscription addresses by visiting his
site at:

http://em.ca/~bruceg/

Charles
Try posting on a relevant mailing list.  Bruce has his "rpms" mailing list
and his "bgware" mailing list, as well as relay-ctrl.  Try asking on one
of those.  You can find the list subscription addresses by visiting his
site at:

http://em.ca/~bruceg/

Charles
Try posting on a relevant mailing list.  Bruce has his "rpms" mailing list
and his "bgware" mailing list, as well as relay-ctrl.  Try asking on one
of those.  You can find the list subscription addresses by visiting his
site at:

http://em.ca/~bruceg/

Charles
Try posting on a relevant mailing list.  Bruce has his "rpms" mailing list
and his "bgware" mailing list, as well as relay-ctrl.  Try asking on one
of those.  You can find the list subscription addresses by visiting his
site at:

http://em.ca/~bruceg/

Charles
Try posting on a relevant mailing list.  Bruce has his "rpms" mailing list
and his "bgware" mailing list, as well as relay-ctrl.  Try asking on one
of those.  You can find the list subscription addresses by visiting his
site at:

http://em.ca/~bruceg/

Charles
Try posting on a relevant mailing list.  Bruce has his "rpms" mailing list
and his "bgware" mailing list, as well as relay-ctrl.  Try asking on one
of those.  You can find the list subscription addresses by visiting his
site at:

http://em.ca/~bruceg/

Charles
Try posting on a relevant mailing list.  Bruce has his "rpms" mailing list
and his "bgware" mailing list, as well as relay-ctrl.  Try asking on one
of those.  You can find the list subscription addresses by visiting his
site at:

http://em.ca/~bruceg/

Charles
Try posting on a relevant mailing list.  Bruce has his "rpms" mailing list
and his "bgware" mailing list, as well as relay-ctrl.  Try asking on one
of those.  You can find the list subscription addresses by visiting his
site at:

http://em.ca/~bruceg/

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Except that I only wrote it once.  I've even checked my local copy of
outgoing mail.  I've never seen a problem like this on this list before.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




Ami Shamril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> How to configure mailder-daemon to reply back to the sender (with error
> message "No such user" or anything...) if the user don't have Maildir in
> their home directory? (Some of the users does not allowed to have email).
> TQ in advance.

If your default delivery is "./Maildir/" and a local user doesn't have a
Maildir, and doesn't have a .qmail file with some other delivery instruction
in it, qmail will already do this.

However, to prevent them from receiving mail at all, regardless of what they
put in a .qmail file, read the manpage for qmail-pw2u.  Pay particular
attention to the part about the file "exclude".

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------




hrm...i having trouble setting up vhosts..... here what i do...

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:fowarder-jrehomes

that goes to

~fowarder/.qmail-jrehomes-sales

in that file i have
salesjre

salesjre is a local account.

what am i doing wrong?  as far as i can see i did everything in the qmail 
howto correctly....

~kurth
Kurth Bemis - Network/Systems Administrator, USAExpress.net/Ozone Computer

People disagree with me.  I just ignore them.
         -- Linus Torvalds, regarding the use of C++ for the Linux kernel

[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth
PGP key available - http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth/pgp

Fight Weak Encryption!  Donate your wasted CPU cycles to Distributed.net 
(http://www.distributed.net)





On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Kurth Bemis wrote:
> hrm...i having trouble setting up vhosts..... here what i do...

The term "vhosts" has no meaning in qmail.

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:fowarder-jrehomes

Where did you put this?

> that goes to
> 
> ~fowarder/.qmail-jrehomes-sales
> 
> in that file i have
> salesjre
> 
> salesjre is a local account.
> 
> what am i doing wrong?

Who knows? You haven't said what your problem is, and what the logs indicate.

Chris




At 11:10 AM 12/21/2000 -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:

your right - i was a bit unclear....

my logs say this-

Dec 21 10:15:58 usa qmail: 977411758.715849 delivery 1046: failure: 
Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-preference_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local._(#5.4.6)/

but my locals file contains this-

usaexpress.net
usa.usaexpress.net
mail.usaexpress.net
www.usaexpress.net

in my /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains file contains this

jrehomes.com:forwarder-jrehomes
harborfresh.com:forwarder-harborfresh
ferretwise.org:forwarder-ferretwise

then in my ~fowarder/.qmail-jrehomes-sales i have
salesjre

hopefully this will be a little more complete....

~kurth

>On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Kurth Bemis wrote:
> > hrm...i having trouble setting up vhosts..... here what i do...
>
>The term "vhosts" has no meaning in qmail.
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:fowarder-jrehomes
>
>Where did you put this?
>
> > that goes to
> >
> > ~fowarder/.qmail-jrehomes-sales
> >
> > in that file i have
> > salesjre
> >
> > salesjre is a local account.
> >
> > what am i doing wrong?
>
>Who knows? You haven't said what your problem is, and what the logs indicate.
>
>Chris





On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 11:27:40AM -0500, Kurth Bemis wrote:
> At 11:10 AM 12/21/2000 -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
> 
> your right - i was a bit unclear....
> 
> my logs say this-

You're being a bit too judicious with your logs. The other lines
associated with this delivery would be handy. How do we know which
domain this delivery is talking about?

> 
> Dec 21 10:15:58 usa qmail: 977411758.715849 delivery 1046: failure: 
> 
>Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-preference_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local._(#5.4.6)/
> 
> but my locals file contains this-
> 
> usaexpress.net
> usa.usaexpress.net
> mail.usaexpress.net
> www.usaexpress.net
> 
> in my /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains file contains this
> 
> jrehomes.com:forwarder-jrehomes
> harborfresh.com:forwarder-harborfresh
> ferretwise.org:forwarder-ferretwise

Have you sent a HUP to qmail-send since changing this file?


Regards.




Hi,
 This is a very confusing thing I am trying to accomplish, but for
reasons outside of my control it must be done. I have a main domain name
of company..com in locals. I have a company.fi:alias-companyfi line in
virtualdomains. The alias file looks like this:

| forward ${DEFAULT}@company.com

 All mail coming to company.fi should be a full equivalent to all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses and mailalternateaddress in the ldap entries.
It is currently working fine, with one problem. One person needs to not
have his incoming mail rewritten to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am controlling
the setting of his outgoing address to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with sendmail at
the firewall, but to not change the incoming address is what I need help
with. I tried to make an alias called .alias-companyfi-user and put
&[EMAIL PROTECTED], then put mailalternateaddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in his
ldap entry, but the message looped and died. 

 Any ideas??

Thanks,
Mike




Quoting Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>  This is a very confusing thing I am trying to accomplish, but for
> reasons outside of my control it must be done. I have a main domain name
> of company..com in locals. I have a company.fi:alias-companyfi line in
> virtualdomains. The alias file looks like this:

Five hits with the whips for not reading QLDAPINSTALL file! :)

----- s n i p -----
~control/ldapdefaultdotmode

 The default interpretation of .qmail files
 Default: ldaponly
 Example: both
 Values: both, dotonly, ldaponly, ldapwithprog, none
 Note: Works only for deliveries based on LDAP lookups.
       Local mails use dotonly like in normal qmail.
----- s n i p -----




Quoting Alex Pennace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 03:03:33PM +0000, Thomas Ackermann wrote:
> > > so whats up here, thought the percenthack is turned off by defualt if
> > > the file's not here ??
> > > help fast!!!
> 
> I give up. Why didn't you bother reading the blinking bold text
> underneath that statement?

Since I went and suggested asking John Levine to add a link for qmail
users when relay test 6 is failed, I decided I might as well ask him
myself.  I whipped up a quick web page at http://meehan.org/qmail.html
that I've asked John to check out.  Feedback from all of you would be
great, too.

Aaron




> > expensive) and have up to 6000 users, and had installed AMaViS 0.2.1 (the
> > shell version). With AMaViS running the "load average" of my server
> > increases rapidly from the normal 0.2 - 0.5 to 30 - 35, and the software
> > watchdog process I run restart the server at every 5min or so.
> 
> Are you telling me you are using a k6-II 450Mhz and 128 MB of RAM to
> handle 6K users ?
> 
> A friend o' mine was using a P100 with 32 MHZ to handle about 4K users,
> running qmail and FreeBSD (Of course), the box runs rock solid for more
> than 800 days.....

looks like you didn't get the point. AMaViS is worse than Windoze when it
comes to resource eating... Using it with sendmail will make you simply
want exchange 2000 with mcafee mailscan... a terrible nightmare.


-- 
Stefan Laudat 
http://www.pepsicola.ro/~stefan
-------------------------------
Two sure ways to tell a sexy male; the first is, he has
a bad memory. I forgot the second.




Qmail with  Vpopmail


We are currently transitining  from Sendmail to Qmail for our main mail
server. 
So we have some users on this new server, and the rest on the old
server. Our relays 
point to the old server and aliases directs qmail users mail to the
Qmail server.

Problem is: when Qmail users send mail to users on the old servers it
trys to deliver
it locally and when the user and dumps it in postmaster mailbox. All
worked fine as of yesterday but now 
it does not work. The domain is not in /var/qmail/locals and my mx
records look fine.
Any ideas ? 

Here is the error from the maillog, user is not in the qmail server but
try to delive it anyway ..



Dec 21 15:14:52 mail-1 qmail: 977440492.682140 starting delivery 6: msg
3244038 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dec 21 15:14:52 mail-1 qmail: 977440492.682279 status: local 1/10 remote
0/20
Dec 21 15:14:52 mail-1 tcpserver: 977440492.699820 tcpserver: end 1892
status 0
Dec 21 15:14:52 mail-1 tcpserver: 977440492.700093 tcpserver: status:
0/20
Dec 21 15:14:52 mail-1 qmail: 977440492.700794 delivery 6: success:
POP_user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/var/vpopmail/domains/iescrow.com/postmaster/




Hi,

I am using qmail 1.03 + ezmlm 0.53 with ezmlm-idx 0.40 on a RedHat 6.1
machine. What i like to know is how can i moderate the subject line
 when ezmlm sends a responce back, say for example to a help request.
The default that is sent is 'ezmlm response', i would like to change that
that can reflect the name of the list.

How can this be done?


Regards
Kiran








On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I am using qmail 1.03 + ezmlm 0.53 with ezmlm-idx 0.40 on a RedHat 6.1
> machine. What i like to know is how can i moderate the subject line
>  when ezmlm sends a responce back, say for example to a help request.
> The default that is sent is 'ezmlm response', i would like to change that
> that can reflect the name of the list.
> 
> How can this be done?
> 

edit ~example/ezmlm-mailing-list/text/
there are so many files inside text directory
you can edit what ever you want to

hope can help you




andi hari






Hi all!
You got a Tool for running a Probetest of e-Mail Delivery??
I wanna probe on 10 MBit.
My Boss doesn't believe me it's the Bandwidth which causes the 9 Secs.
Average Message Delay.

Many Thanks in Advance!!
CYA,
 Micha..



Reply via email to