Paul Jarc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 November 2000 at 13:21:16 -0500
> Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I want an unambiguous license included with the software that
> > explicitly defines what I am allowed to do with it. If you don't
> > need that then fine, but please don't argue that it's not needed,
> > because there are clearly a number of people on this list that
> > desire it.
>
> Please don't confuse need with desire. You may not like dist.html or
> softwarelaw.html or rights.html, but I don't see ambiguity in them,
> and I don't see how including them in the software distributions would
> make them any more legally significant.
Equally, you should not confuse *your* needs (or lack thereof) with
other people's needs.
--
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
