Van Liedekerke Franky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2) I've found many remarks on qmail and reiserfs, but nobody agrees on
> wether it's good or bad. So I won't start that here all over again but I
> would like to ask:
> does anybody use qmail+reiserfs on a high-load production machine?
Several people have mentioned on the list that they are using qmail on
ReiserFS in serious production environments. A small patch to qmail is
necessary to prevent lost data in the event of certain failures; I can't
find the patch at the moment, but it's out there somewhere.
There is a page on qmail+ReiserFS here:
http://www.jedi.claranet.fr/qmail-reiserfs-howto.html
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------