On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 04:30:24PM -0400, Charles McLagan wrote: > Because, just like with this email, I hit "reply all" and Microsoft > Outlook puts your address and the list address into the To: field. ... > Now, one can trash Microsoft, or Netscape, or whoever makes the MUA, > but the bottom line is, this is how they work and this is how 99% of > users would use them even if there were a reply-to-recipient choice. > > So the question is: is there a sensible (or kludgey, hack, yet > sufficient) way to cope with it today? Do you consider it sensible to use a mailer which has a list reply feature? Alternatively, do you consider it sensible to use a mail system which files duplicates in a separate folder? Alternatively, if you prefer to deal with it in a lowest-common- denominator fashion, do you consider it sensible to use a keyboard? -- Raul
- Re: qmail list reply-to Brett Randall
- Re: qmail list reply-to Jason Brooke
- Re: qmail list reply-to Brett Randall
- Re: qmail list reply-to Charles McLagan
- Re: qmail list reply-to Vince Vielhaber
- Re: qmail list reply-to Robin S. Socha
- Re: qmail list reply-to Vince Vielhaber
- Re: qmail list reply-to Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail list reply-to Ronny Haryanto
- Re: qmail list reply-to Andy Bradford
- Re: qmail list reply-to Raul Miller
- Re: qmail list reply-to Adam McKenna
- OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list reply-to... Mike Glover
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Brett Randall
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Dave Sill
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Brett Randall
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... David L. Nicol
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Dave Sill
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Robin S. Socha
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Peter van Dijk
