Greg White wrote:
> Just to confirm -- Mark has probably hit the nail on the head with this
> one:
>
> root@frodo:~# dig -x 63.105.9.34
>
> ; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> -x
> ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
> ;; got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 4
> ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
> ;; QUERY SECTION:
> ;; 34.9.105.63.in-addr.arpa, type = ANY, class = IN
OK, let me try that.
> IMHO, any competent DNS admin should _never_, _ever_ permit _any_
> address he is responsible for to be answered NXDOMAIN for a PTR record.
> This is just unacceptably sloppy DNS admin. Lots of DNS admins do it,
> but then again lots of DNS admins run and like M$ DNS or BIND ;).
>
> Grrrrrr. Incompetent DNS administration at this level really yanks my
> chain...
I do run bind and set DNS up for the first time.
What should I change, remove or add in your opinion?
Jan
--
Jan Knepper
Smartsoft, LLC
88 Petersburg Road
Petersburg, NJ 08270
U.S.A.
http://www.smartsoft.cc/
http://www.mp3.com/pianoprincess
Phone : 609-628-4260
FAX : 609-628-1267
FAX : 303-845-6415 http://www.fax4free.com/
Phone : 020-873-3837 http://www.xoip.nl/ (Dutch)
FAX : 020-873-3837 http://www.xoip.nl/ (Dutch)
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
