-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 7 Sep 2000, at 16:03, Dave Sill wrote:
> The RFC says "should" not "must" or "MUST", so Jost is correct: the
> RFC's don't *demand* it.
But doesn't that RFC say that MTA "should" deliver the message,
not "must"? If you think that "should" means "only if it feels like
doing that", there's no hope to get any e-mail delivered reliably. :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 -- QDPGP 2.61b
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html
iQA/AwUBObiGmVMwP8g7qbw/EQJd+wCgi9tnTQaz9hBOfw3sQ42IcLYdj6sAoPck
1waeWJ8LmrWYVKmYFXMQq8ep
=s1/5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
[Tom Waits]
