[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Are you using multiple spindes? Can I recommend that you do. > > Do you mean separate hard disks for the queue? .. The queue resides > on a RAID5 hardware controlled array. > I seem to remember someone saying that RAID5 is exactly the wrong kind of RAID for a mail queue. As I understand it, RAID5 does read of the same sector(?) of all spindles, recalculates parity, then a write back to all (only one?) spindles. This would be quite a write penalty if the RAID controller honored fsync's. You might want to check the archives for it because my feeble memory may be fooling me, but I've seen lots of people recommend RAID1+0 for mail queues. Eric
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance ... Petr Novotny
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance ... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance ... Jason Haar
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips Bryan White
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips Steve Wolfe
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips Bryan White
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips Pro-People
- RE: Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips simon . elder
- Re: Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips markd
- RE: Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips Dave Sill
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips Eric Cox
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips Steve Wolfe
- Re: Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips John R. Levine
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips Greg Cope
- Re: Mass Mailout Performance Tips Michael T. Babcock
