qmail Digest 5 Sep 2000 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1114
Topics (messages 47908 through 47950):
outgoing mail
47908 by: Stano Pa�ka
47924 by: Johan Almqvist
Real slow shutdown of RedHat 6.x
47909 by: Brett Randall
47913 by: Chris K. Young
Re: smtproutes examples ?
47910 by: Ricardo Cerqueira
Re: trouble injecting ....
47911 by: Chris K. Young
47921 by: Adam McKenna
Re: domain
47912 by: Magnus Bodin
file /users/assign
47914 by: Marco
47915 by: James Raftery
Popbull-related problem
47916 by: Zbigniew Baniewski
usage of qmailanalog
47917 by: Jens Georg
Problem in sending one message to few lists I own
47918 by: Yair Zohar
47919 by: Henrik �hman
Re: Open relay test.
47920 by: Stephen F. Bosch
Limiting qmail to save OS
47922 by: Paul Farber
47925 by: Steve Wolfe
47935 by: simon.elder.bidorbuy.com
Rules Antispam
47923 by: tigre21.gamma.qnet.com.pe
What am i missing?
47926 by: Maximo
47929 by: Peter van Dijk
Shouldn't rcpthosts be empty to ward off spam?
47927 by: Peter Janett
47928 by: Ricardo Cerqueira
47930 by: David Dyer-Bennet
47932 by: Peter Janett
47933 by: David Dyer-Bennet
47947 by: wolfgang zeikat
47948 by: Chris K. Young
47949 by: wolfgang zeikat
qmail and mail problem
47931 by: Danny Hay
47945 by: Chris K. Young
Re: Alias Support Question
47934 by: tom.sarratt.jr
47936 by: tom.sarratt.jr
47939 by: tom.sarratt.jr
I have a problem
47937 by: Ima Guru
47938 by: ChrisHellberg
47941 by: Steve Carter
47942 by: Brett Randall
Slightly Off Topic
47940 by: Shane Wise
47946 by: Chris K. Young
qmail-start with error=111
47943 by: gmo.gmx.de
47944 by: Brett Randall
Temporary_error_on_maildir_delivery._(#4.3.0)/
47950 by: Manuel Gisbert
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Imagine:
I have subdomain sss.ddd.com
Domain has mail server on
mmm.ddd.com
My qmail is running on computer
ccc.sss.ddd.com
I want send every mail that is not addressed
to subdomain sss.ddd.com
to computer mmm.ddd.com
I think this is done by smtproutes, but
what?
In smtproutes I can define domains, but I need ALL,
except my domain
Stano Paska
|
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:07:21PM +0200, Stano Paska wrote:
> I have subdomain sss.ddd.com
First out: give us real domain names. Avoids confusion.
> Domain has mail server on mmm.ddd.com
> My qmail is running on computer ccc.sss.ddd.com
> I want send every mail that is not addressed to subdomain sss.ddd.com
> to computer mmm.ddd.com
> I think this is done by smtproutes, but what?
> In smtproutes I can define domains, but I need ALL, except my domain
Where do you want mail to the domain sss.ddd.com to go?
If you want it handled locally, try putting
:mmm.ddd.com
into control/smtproutes
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
Hi guys
I have had this problem for awhile now with every Linux + qmail box I have
set up. I have used all RedHat 6.x, running qmail with tcpserver on the
qmail and pop3 daemons, and supervise to keep an eye on it all, logging with
multilog. When I go to shutdown/restart a linux box, the killing of the
kernel logger and system logger takes absolutely ages, whereas without qmail
running (ie if none of it is alive when I shut the machine down) then it
shuts down just as normal. I have set up all as per Life With Qmail, so I
don't believe you need to read through my startup scripts since they are
virtually exactly the same as LWQ (with the obvious changes). Has anyone had
these problems, and more importantly has anyone solved them?
Thanks,
/BR
Manager
InterPlanetary Solutions
http://ipsware.com/
Quoted from Brett Randall:
> When I go to shutdown/restart a linux box, the killing of the
> kernel logger and system logger takes absolutely ages, whereas without qmail
> running (ie if none of it is alive when I shut the machine down) then it
> shuts down just as normal.
Hmm. /me thinks. Do you use svscan to start up your supervise processes?
There was a time when I neglected to have svscan killed off first, so
when I started killing off the supervise processes, they get respawned.
This, needless to say, does not make for a smooth shutdown.
All this is just a wild guess, of course.
---Chris K.
--
Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a dropped message between friends?
Auckland, New Zealand |_ this is UDP, not TCP after all ;) ---John H.
http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ Robinson, IV
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 08:05:43AM +0200, mailing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone possibly send a few control/smtproutes examples, I haven't been
>able to find much info in the docs.
>
man 8 qmail-remote
> Is it possible to forward all mail for adomain.com to mailserver.domain.com using
>this ?
>
Yes, it is.
RC
--
+-------------------
| Ricardo Cerqueira
| PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42
| Novis - Engenharia ISP / Rede T�cnica
| P�. Duque Saldanha, 1, 7� E / 1050-094 Lisboa / Portugal
| Tel: +351 21 0100000 - Fax: +351 21 0100001
PGP signature
Quoted from Adam McKenna:
> Most likely you have the wrong permissions set on qmail-queue, it should look
> like this:
>
> -rws--x--x 1 qmailq qmail 11308 May 2 02:57 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
I initally thought that too, but then I read the whole of Fabio's
message, and realised that Fabio's qmail-queue has exactly the same
ownership and permissions.
I suspect that /var was mounted with nosuid or somesuch. Or rather,
that was my conclusion when I first read the message, since I have
not given it further thought since.
---Chris K.
--
Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a dropped message between friends?
Auckland, New Zealand |_ this is UDP, not TCP after all ;) ---John H.
http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ Robinson, IV
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:44:02PM +1200, Chris K. Young wrote:
> Quoted from Adam McKenna:
> > Most likely you have the wrong permissions set on qmail-queue, it should look
> > like this:
> >
> > -rws--x--x 1 qmailq qmail 11308 May 2 02:57 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
>
> I initally thought that too, but then I read the whole of Fabio's
> message, and realised that Fabio's qmail-queue has exactly the same
> ownership and permissions.
>
> I suspect that /var was mounted with nosuid or somesuch. Or rather,
> that was my conclusion when I first read the message, since I have
> not given it further thought since.
Yes, I had an offline conversation with him that determined exactly that.
--Adam
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:43:52AM +0200, Stano Paska wrote:
> Imagine:
> I have domain ddd.com
> Qmail runs on computer ccc (FQDN is ccc.ddd.com)
> Some user is uuu
> Qmail works well, but only when I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If I try send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it fails
> (I have MX record in my DNS server)
>
> What can I do?
Do you have ddd.com in control/rcpthosts?
Do you want to have the domain local or virtual?
Have you restarted qmail?
Also: check out http://x42.com/qmail/cookbook/domains/
/magnus
--
http://x42.com/
|
Hi,
Warning: users/assign checking not
implemented
The file contains the following:
+{domain.name}-:{domain.name}:{vpopmailUID}:{vpopmailGID}:/home/vpopmail/domains/{domain.name}:-::
.
The question is: what is the syntax for this file
and what is its role in the message delivering to a user created with
qmailadmin?
It's not functioning properly.
Thank you
Marco
|
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:25:28PM +0200, Marco wrote:
> The question is: what is the syntax for this file and what is its
> role in the message delivering to a user created with qmailadmin?
man qmail-users
It specifies what user local deliveries will be carried out as, and
which .qmail file(s) to use.
> It's not functioning properly.
Perhaps you could elaborate on that a bit?
Regards,
james
--
James Raftery (JBR54) - Programmer Hostmaster - IE TLD Hostmaster
IE Domain Registry - www.domainregistry.ie - (+353 1) 706 2375
"Managing 4000 customer domains with BIND has been a lot like
herding cats." - Mike Batchelor, on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Got strange problems with popbull (Qmail 1.03 + popbull patch 1.03):
the new popbull patch isn't using 'cur' timestamp, but the stamp on the
'.timestamp' file in Maildir sub-dir. If I properly understood the popbull's
way of working, it should compare the time of the bulletins with the time of
the '.timestamp' - when bulletin is older, it shouldn't make a symlink in
/home/user/Maildir/new, when bulletin is newer, it should make a symlink,
and refresh the time of '.timestamp' (am I right?), to avoid sending the
bulletin over and over again.
And this is exactly my problem: the users are receiving bulletins still
over and over, because (if I properly understand) time of the '.timestamp'
is not refreshed after receiving the bulletin; it remain's still the same.
When I erase .timestamp file, it's created by popbull anew, but then it
remains with it's date of creation forever.
Popbull is invoked in the following way:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -t3 -H -l pirx.ispid.com.pl 0 pop3 \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup pirx.ispid.com.pl /bin/checkpassword \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popbull /var/spool/bulletins /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d
Maildir &
(last line, of course, isn't divided like above - 3. and 4. line are the
same line)
Perhaps somebody has a tip, how to get this to work properly?
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
hi,
can somebody please tell me how to analyse /var/log/mail using the
qmailanalog utils ? i followed the manpages, but output is always
empty.
--
regards,
jens
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
department computer science, university of dortmund
linux ... life's too short for reboots!
begin:vcard
n:Georg;Jens
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:University of Dortmund, Germany;computer science
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Jens Georg
end:vcard
Hello,
I own few ezmlm lists, I want to send a message to some of the lists at
once,
there are clients subscribed to more than one list,
is there a tool that prevents this situation of clients getting more
than one copy of the message ?
Thanks,
Yair
You could always do this:
ezmlm-make . newlist ...
ezmlm-list list1 > subs
ezmlm-list list2 >>subs
...
ezmlm-sub `cat subs |sort|uniq`
I haven't tried, but it should work.
Henrik.
At 07:03 PM 9/4/00 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello,
>I own few ezmlm lists, I want to send a message to some of the lists at
>once,
>there are clients subscribed to more than one list,
>is there a tool that prevents this situation of clients getting more
>than one copy of the message ?
>Thanks,
>Yair
>
>
"OK 2 NET - Andr� Paulsberg" wrote:
>
> > I imagine that more than one person on this list has spoken to ORBS
> > about their misleading relay test? How many people have ended up on the
> > ORBS list simply because their qmail installations accepted emails with
> > "%" or "!" in the To: field?
>
> NO ONE!
>
> ORBS tester requires the E-Mail to reach them at their test account,
> this can only happen if you are an Open Relay server.
> They also keep the relayed message at their site for verification.
AH good.
=)
-Stephen-
hello all
frequently (about 2 times a month) the file limits are being exceeded by
qmail haveing to many files open. The box only has qmail/vpopmail and
pop3 running on it.
I have traced the 'failure' to 2 messages with 1053 reciepients listed.
Evidently there is no way I can find to increase the 1024 open file limit
on my 2.2.12 Red Hat box.
How do you control the incoming mail as to not force the system to error
out because of not open file resources?
Why dose qmail itself keep accepting SMTP connections (and having to
open a file to dump the mail to) when it must be getting an error about no
more open handles available???
Is anyone else runnng into this?
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
> frequently (about 2 times a month) the file limits are being exceeded by
> qmail haveing to many files open. The box only has qmail/vpopmail and
> pop3 running on it.
>
> I have traced the 'failure' to 2 messages with 1053 reciepients listed.
>
> Evidently there is no way I can find to increase the 1024 open file limit
> on my 2.2.12 Red Hat box.
I'm not familiar enough with the internals of qmail to give you any
advice on it's behaviour, but it is certainly possible to increase the
number of open files above 1024 on Linux. see:
http://customer.support.redhat.com/rhoaprod/plsql/xxrh_know_pkg.srch2?p_id=3
52
While those instructions were written for the 2.0.x kernels, I've used
the same procedure on 2.2.x, 2.3.x, and 2.4.x kernels.
steve
Hi ,
To increase the number of file descriptors on Redhat 6.x add this to
then end of /etc/rc.d/rc.local .
# increase max files
echo "32768" > /proc/sys/fs/file-max
# increase max inodes
echo "131072" > /proc/sys/fs/inode-max
Adjust the numbers to suit your install. You can also set the /proc
values on the fly.
To see how many files and inodes are in use
cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
cat /proc/sys/fs/inode-nr
It gets a bit more complex than this as some programs set there
maximum file descriptors at compile time ( eg squid) , dont think
qmail falls into this category. You need to tweak some kernel include
files for these ones /usr/include/linux/limits.h
/usr/include/linux/tasks.h
Regards
Simon.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 September 2000 5:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FW: Limiting qmail to save OS
>
>
> hello all
>
> frequently (about 2 times a month) the file limits are being
> exceeded by
> qmail haveing to many files open. The box only has qmail/vpopmail
and
> pop3 running on it.
>
> I have traced the 'failure' to 2 messages with 1053
> reciepients listed.
>
> Evidently there is no way I can find to increase the 1024
> open file limit
> on my 2.2.12 Red Hat box.
>
> How do you control the incoming mail as to not force the
> system to error
> out because of not open file resources?
>
> Why dose qmail itself keep accepting SMTP connections (and having to
> open a file to dump the mail to) when it must be getting an
> error about no
> more open handles available???
>
> Is anyone else runnng into this?
>
> Paul Farber
> Farber Technology
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ph 570-628-5303
> Fax 570-628-5545
>
>
Hi, friends
Sorry, because I'm new in the world qmail
I need know where is the information about rules antispam
I won't be a open relay.
Please send me URL's for this configuration and also
for the way of try than my configuration is OK.
Where can I try my configuration?
I tried make a
telnet mailabuse.org
Is it a good try?
Thanks.
When i start qmail , all i get is a lot of lines like this:
#multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied
Thanks
Max
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 06:06:44PM -0300, Maximo wrote:
> When i start qmail , all i get is a lot of lines like this:
> #multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied
Add a 'cd /' to your startup script before qmail (with multilog) is
started.
Greetz, Peter.
I apologize of this is in the docs somewhere, but I didn't see it.
If I understand what rcpthosts does, I would think that this file should be
empty. My understanding is that if the "To:" address contains a domain name
listed in rcpthosts, then it will relay that email. So, a spammer can send
a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], and to a bunch of
spam victums in the cc and bcc fields.
If that's correct, and I'm using POP before SMTP, should I have an empty
rcpthosts file?
Thanks,
Peter Janett
New Media One Web Services
================================
WEB HOSTING FOR WEB DEVELOPERS
================================
-> Sun, IRIX, NT, Linux <-
PHP, MySQL, Perl, Cold Fusion,
MS SQL, ASP, SSI, SSL
http://www.newmediaone.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(303)828-9882
Wrong. qmail looks at the envelope recipient, not at the headers.
Besides... Having an empty rcpthosts would block mail allright... Even your
own local mail.
RC
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 03:57:45PM -0600, Peter Janett wrote:
> I apologize of this is in the docs somewhere, but I didn't see it.
>
> If I understand what rcpthosts does, I would think that this file should be
> empty. My understanding is that if the "To:" address contains a domain name
> listed in rcpthosts, then it will relay that email. So, a spammer can send
> a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], and to a bunch of
> spam victums in the cc and bcc fields.
>
> If that's correct, and I'm using POP before SMTP, should I have an empty
> rcpthosts file?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter Janett
>
> New Media One Web Services
> ================================
> WEB HOSTING FOR WEB DEVELOPERS
> ================================
> -> Sun, IRIX, NT, Linux <-
> PHP, MySQL, Perl, Cold Fusion,
> MS SQL, ASP, SSI, SSL
> http://www.newmediaone.net
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (303)828-9882
>
--
+-------------------
| Ricardo Cerqueira
| PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42
| Novis - Engenharia ISP / Rede T�cnica
| P�. Duque Saldanha, 1, 7� E / 1050-094 Lisboa / Portugal
| Tel: +351 21 0100000 - Fax: +351 21 0100001
PGP signature
Peter Janett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 4 September 2000 at 15:57:45 -0600
> I apologize of this is in the docs somewhere, but I didn't see it.
>
> If I understand what rcpthosts does, I would think that this file should be
> empty. My understanding is that if the "To:" address contains a domain name
> listed in rcpthosts, then it will relay that email. So, a spammer can send
> a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], and to a bunch of
> spam victums in the cc and bcc fields.
Don't think "relay". Think "deliver". That's why it's named
"rcpthosts". That's "receipt hosts". That's "hosts you will
*receive* mail for". So it should list, like, all the hosts you will
unrestrictedly receive mail for. Which generally means the ones
listed in locals plus the ones listed in virtualdomains. You want any
site in the world to be able to send you mail for those sites.
I *think* the reason so many people get confused about this is because
of using POP clients, which send their outgoing mail via smtp. That's
an anomaly and a distortion. Thinking about that as your normal model
makes all the terminology come out wrong and causes confusion. In the
*normal* unix world, locally-originated mail is injected into the
queue via qmail-inject, not delivered via smtp.
(Nothing at all wrong with using pop clients and such, it's just that
they don't follow the normal mail model, so trying to think about MTAs
from a pop client perspective seems to cause confusion.)
Now, "relaying" means "accept via SMTP mail that will NOT be delivered
locally, but will instead be sent on via SMTP".
Because of the need for relaying (if you act as a smart host for
system hidden behind you, or because of the need to relay for POP
clients), there are *two* kinds of mail you want to accept via SMTP:
First, mail intended for the local environment. This is determined by
examing the envelope RCPT field; rcpthosts identifies which mail
should be accepted for this reason.
Second, mail which you wish to relay to its destination. This mail is
identified based on where it comes *from* (the IP address of the
system initiating the SMTP connection), not where it's going *to*.
This mail is identified by the RELAYCLIENT environment variable set by
tcpserver, based on the originating IP address, either statically, or
dynamically using pop-before-smtp. (or is injected locally using
qmail-inject; mail injected locally will never be bounced based on
anti-relaying rules).
--
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon
Bookworms: http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the responses.
Let me make sure I understand.
If newmediaone.net is in rcpthosts, and some spammer send this message via
SMTP:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: whatever
Will the message be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not the other
addresses listed?
Thanks!
Peter Janett
New Media One Web Services
================================
WEB HOSTING FOR WEB DEVELOPERS
================================
-> Sun, IRIX, NT, Linux <-
PHP, MySQL, Perl, Cold Fusion,
MS SQL, ASP, SSI, SSL
http://www.newmediaone.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(303)828-9882
----- Original Message -----
From: David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Peter Janett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: Shouldn't rcpthosts be empty to ward off spam?
> Peter Janett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 4 September 2000 at
15:57:45 -0600
> > I apologize of this is in the docs somewhere, but I didn't see it.
> >
> > If I understand what rcpthosts does, I would think that this file
should be
> > empty. My understanding is that if the "To:" address contains a domain
name
> > listed in rcpthosts, then it will relay that email. So, a spammer can
send
> > a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], and to a bunch
of
> > spam victums in the cc and bcc fields.
>
> Don't think "relay". Think "deliver". That's why it's named
> "rcpthosts". That's "receipt hosts". That's "hosts you will
> *receive* mail for". So it should list, like, all the hosts you will
> unrestrictedly receive mail for. Which generally means the ones
> listed in locals plus the ones listed in virtualdomains. You want any
> site in the world to be able to send you mail for those sites.
>
> I *think* the reason so many people get confused about this is because
> of using POP clients, which send their outgoing mail via smtp. That's
> an anomaly and a distortion. Thinking about that as your normal model
> makes all the terminology come out wrong and causes confusion. In the
> *normal* unix world, locally-originated mail is injected into the
> queue via qmail-inject, not delivered via smtp.
>
> (Nothing at all wrong with using pop clients and such, it's just that
> they don't follow the normal mail model, so trying to think about MTAs
> from a pop client perspective seems to cause confusion.)
>
> Now, "relaying" means "accept via SMTP mail that will NOT be delivered
> locally, but will instead be sent on via SMTP".
>
> Because of the need for relaying (if you act as a smart host for
> system hidden behind you, or because of the need to relay for POP
> clients), there are *two* kinds of mail you want to accept via SMTP:
>
> First, mail intended for the local environment. This is determined by
> examing the envelope RCPT field; rcpthosts identifies which mail
> should be accepted for this reason.
>
> Second, mail which you wish to relay to its destination. This mail is
> identified based on where it comes *from* (the IP address of the
> system initiating the SMTP connection), not where it's going *to*.
> This mail is identified by the RELAYCLIENT environment variable set by
> tcpserver, based on the originating IP address, either statically, or
> dynamically using pop-before-smtp. (or is injected locally using
> qmail-inject; mail injected locally will never be bounced based on
> anti-relaying rules).
> --
> Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ Minicon:
http://www.mnstf.org/minicon
> Bookworms: http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b
> David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Peter Janett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 4 September 2000 at 18:06:17 -0600
> Thanks for the responses.
>
> Let me make sure I understand.
>
> If newmediaone.net is in rcpthosts, and some spammer send this message via
> SMTP:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> BCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: whatever
>
> Will the message be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not the other
> addresses listed?
Don't confuse headers with SMTP envelope recipients. There's no
necessary relationship at all; and to the MTA, the message hearders
are nothing but data. They're carried along, but they don't control
anything.
If a spammer sent that message with an envelope recipient of
[EMAIL PROTECTED], it would be accepted because newmediaone.net is in
rcpthosts.
If the spammer sent a second envelope recipient of [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and aol.com is NOT in your rcpthosts, he'd get an error on that
recipient (unless RELAYCLIENT had been set through tcpserver when this
connection was accepted).
--
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon
Bookworms: http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also sprach David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04.09.2000:
>If a spammer sent that message with an envelope recipient of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], it would be accepted because newmediaone.net is in
>rcpthosts.
does that mean: the message is accepted *and* the mails to the Cc: header
recipients (which are not in rcpthosts) are *also* delivered? that was the
original question.
>If the spammer sent a second envelope recipient of [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>and aol.com is NOT in your rcpthosts, he'd get an error on that
>recipient (unless RELAYCLIENT had been set through tcpserver when this
>connection was accepted).
does a Cc: header create a second envenlope recipient? (so far i thought
it doesnt)
wolfgang
Quoted from wolfgang zeikat:
> does that mean: the message is accepted *and* the mails to the Cc: header
> recipients (which are not in rcpthosts) are *also* delivered? that was the
> original question.
Yes, I figured that was the question. Of course, qmail-smtpd is an
SMTP server; it only cares about what's in the envelope. It _doesn't_
care about what's in the message header.
Envelope recipients are accepted or rejected on a case-by-case basis.
If you specify multiple recipients in an SMTP conversation, some may
be accepted, some may be rejected. control/rcpthosts determines which
ones to accept/reject.
> does a Cc: header create a second envenlope recipient? (so far i thought
> it doesnt)
The machine talking to the SMTP server may specify the Cc recipient
as an envelope recipient. The SMTP server itself, however, does not
do that (since, as I said before, the SMTP server does not look at
the message header).
As lurkers should tell by now: the envelope is totally independent of
the header. Bcc works because it specifies recipients in the envelope
that do not get specified in the header.
---Chris K.
--
Chris, the Young One |_ If you can't afford a backup system, you can't
Auckland, New Zealand |_ afford to have important data on your computer.
http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ ---Tracy R. Reed
Also sprach David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04.09.2000:
>If a spammer sent that message with an envelope recipient of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], it would be accepted because newmediaone.net is in
>rcpthosts.
does that mean: the message is accepted *and* the mails to the Cc: header
recipients (which are not in rcpthosts) are *also* delivered? that was the
original question.
>If the spammer sent a second envelope recipient of [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>and aol.com is NOT in your rcpthosts, he'd get an error on that
>recipient (unless RELAYCLIENT had been set through tcpserver when this
>connection was accepted).
does a Cc: header create a second envenlope recipient? (so far i thought
it doesnt)
wolfgang
Hi, i have recently installed qmail and everything is working fine bar one
thing... on our website we run a cut down version of slashcode which allows
users to sign up for accounts and personalise their view of our site, during
the registration procedure the site sends the user their user name and
password to them via email... its does this by using the program "mail"
which worked fine when using sendmail, however since switching to qmail when
ever someone tries to sign up they never get their password we get this
error in the apache logs
"newaliases: fatal: unable to create /etc/aliases.tmp: access denied" now i
was wondering if there is a "mail" variant for qmail... any help would be
greately appreciated
Cheers
Danny
Quoted from Danny Hay:
> however since switching to qmail when
> ever someone tries to sign up they never get their password we get this
> error in the apache logs
> "newaliases: fatal: unable to create /etc/aliases.tmp: access denied"
Let me ask: why is your script trying to run ``newaliases''? It has no
business doing so. If newaliases needs to be run, do it via a cron job.
qmail's (or rather, fastforward's) newaliases has to be called by a
user with write access to /etc; usually the superuser. sendmail's
version, on the other hand, can be called by all ``trusted'' (class t
in sendmail.cf) users, since sendmail is setuid.
Just take out any instances of ``newaliases'' from your script, and I
believe things will be fine.
---Chris K.
--
Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a dropped message between friends?
Auckland, New Zealand |_ this is UDP, not TCP after all ;) ---John H.
http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ Robinson, IV
Tim,
Thanks for the suggestion, however, after changing ownership and acces
params, it still would not work.
Therefore, this is how the .qmail-postmaster file looks now:
Filename: /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster
access params: 0644
owner: root
group: qmail
File Contents:
START OF FILE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
END OF FILE
Exact contents of the error message:
*** START OF CONTENTS ***
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mpmail.inside.missionprinting.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 3525 invoked by uid 508); 5 Sep 2000 02:24:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sarrtport1) (158.95.210.54)
by mpmail.inside.missionprinting.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2000 02:24:40 -0000
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "tom.sarratt.jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FW: TEST
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 21:23:35 -0500
Message-ID: <001901c016e0$4b73cea0$36d25f9e@sarrtport1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
ANOTHER TEST
-----Original Message-----
From: tom.sarratt.jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 9:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: TEST
*** END OF CONTENTS ***
Do anyone have any suggestions as to why the ALIAS support feature does not
work?
Thanks!
Tom Sarratt
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Legant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 8:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alias Support Question
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:04:10AM -0500, tom.sarratt.jr wrote:
>
[snip...]
> Rights to the .qmail-postmaster file:
>
> access params: 0664
> owner: alias
> group: qmail
[snip...]
According to INSTALL.alias, you should create the ~alias/.qmail-XXX
files by touching them. Presumably you *wouldn't* be logged in as alias,
so the owner wouldn't be alias. Maybe that doesn't matter, but upon
inspection, I find all my ~alias/.qmail-XXX files are owned by
root:qmail.
Also, and more importantly, the dot-qmail man page says:
If .qmail is world-writable or group-writable, qmail-local
stops and indicates a temporary failure.
Your permissions are group writable. chmod 644 .qmail-postmaster and see
if the delivery works.
Tim
--
Tim Legant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave,
Earlier, you asked me for the data from the logfiles showing the event of
sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After some study, I found this information. Here it is:
<from file /var/log/message>
*** BEGINNING OF TRANSACTION ***
Sep 5 04:01:36 mpmail smtpd: 968122896.088214 tcpserver: status: 1/32
Sep 5 04:01:36 mpmail smtpd: 968122896.089696 tcpserver: pid 3755 from
158.95.210.54
Sep 5 04:01:36 mpmail smtpd: 968122896.094373 tcpserver: ok 3755
mpmail.inside.missionprinting.org:158.95.210.7:25 :158.95.210.54::1069
Sep 5 04:01:36 mpmail smtpd: 968122896.143675 tcpserver: end 3755 status 0
Sep 5 04:01:36 mpmail smtpd: 968122896.143814 tcpserver: status: 0/32
*** END OF TRANSACTION ***
Is this what you asked for?
Thank you for any assistance you can send my way on this.
Regards,
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: tom.sarratt.jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 9:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Alias Support Question
Tim,
Thanks for the suggestion, however, after changing ownership and acces
params, it still would not work.
Therefore, this is how the .qmail-postmaster file looks now:
Filename: /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster
access params: 0644
owner: root
group: qmail
File Contents:
START OF FILE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
END OF FILE
Exact contents of the error message:
*** START OF CONTENTS ***
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mpmail.inside.missionprinting.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 3525 invoked by uid 508); 5 Sep 2000 02:24:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sarrtport1) (158.95.210.54)
by mpmail.inside.missionprinting.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2000 02:24:40 -0000
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "tom.sarratt.jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FW: TEST
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 21:23:35 -0500
Message-ID: <001901c016e0$4b73cea0$36d25f9e@sarrtport1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
ANOTHER TEST
-----Original Message-----
From: tom.sarratt.jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 9:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: TEST
*** END OF CONTENTS ***
Do anyone have any suggestions as to why the ALIAS support feature does not
work?
Thanks!
Tom Sarratt
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Legant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 8:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alias Support Question
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:04:10AM -0500, tom.sarratt.jr wrote:
>
[snip...]
> Rights to the .qmail-postmaster file:
>
> access params: 0664
> owner: alias
> group: qmail
[snip...]
According to INSTALL.alias, you should create the ~alias/.qmail-XXX
files by touching them. Presumably you *wouldn't* be logged in as alias,
so the owner wouldn't be alias. Maybe that doesn't matter, but upon
inspection, I find all my ~alias/.qmail-XXX files are owned by
root:qmail.
Also, and more importantly, the dot-qmail man page says:
If .qmail is world-writable or group-writable, qmail-local
stops and indicates a temporary failure.
Your permissions are group writable. chmod 644 .qmail-postmaster and see
if the delivery works.
Tim
--
Tim Legant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim,
Thank you for the previous recommendations. However, it still is not
working... (this is crazy)
To answer you directly:
1) In /var/qmail/control does rcpthosts and locals have:
missionprinting.org
in them?
ANSWER:
rcpthosts did have it.
locals did not have it.
Instructions provided at:
http://www.tibus.net/pgregg/projects/qmail/single-uid-howto.html
specifically said not to add <company>.<org> to the locals file as it would
disturb delivery of EMAIL. I tried it, and the server would receive EMAIL
for everyone, but would not place the EMAIL in anyone's boxes.
2) Users are defined as you documented below in the assign file.
3) START/STOP QMAIL. At this point, I am rebooting the server just to be
sure...
***
More suggestions will be welcomed. Please keep me in mind!
Thanks!
Tom Sarratt
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Lorenc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 12:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Alias Support Question
Tom,
In /var/qmail/control does rcpthosts and locals have:
missionprinting.org
in them?
And the next thing I can think of is where does the
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
point to? Is it defined in /var/qmail/users/assign file?
=tom.sarrett.jr:<unix id>:UID:GID:<home-directory>:::
And then you created the cdb file using the
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-newu command?
Or is it an aliases that is defined in /etc/aliases
that is used by fastforward?
I am just throwing out ideas... to debug this...
And after all the changes, have you stopped and started qmail?
I have attached a PDF which helps to show the flow
through qmail (the Big Picture)...
-Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: tom.sarratt.jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 9:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Alias Support Question
Tim,
Thanks for the suggestion, however, after changing ownership and acces
params, it still would not work.
Therefore, this is how the .qmail-postmaster file looks now:
Filename: /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster
access params: 0644
owner: root
group: qmail
File Contents:
START OF FILE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
END OF FILE
Exact contents of the error message:
*** START OF CONTENTS ***
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mpmail.inside.missionprinting.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 3525 invoked by uid 508); 5 Sep 2000 02:24:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sarrtport1) (158.95.210.54)
by mpmail.inside.missionprinting.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2000 02:24:40 -0000
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "tom.sarratt.jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FW: TEST
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 21:23:35 -0500
Message-ID: <001901c016e0$4b73cea0$36d25f9e@sarrtport1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
ANOTHER TEST
-----Original Message-----
From: tom.sarratt.jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 9:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: TEST
*** END OF CONTENTS ***
Do anyone have any suggestions as to why the ALIAS support feature does not
work?
Thanks!
Tom Sarratt
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Legant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 8:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alias Support Question
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:04:10AM -0500, tom.sarratt.jr wrote:
>
[snip...]
> Rights to the .qmail-postmaster file:
>
> access params: 0664
> owner: alias
> group: qmail
[snip...]
According to INSTALL.alias, you should create the ~alias/.qmail-XXX
files by touching them. Presumably you *wouldn't* be logged in as alias,
so the owner wouldn't be alias. Maybe that doesn't matter, but upon
inspection, I find all my ~alias/.qmail-XXX files are owned by
root:qmail.
Also, and more importantly, the dot-qmail man page says:
If .qmail is world-writable or group-writable, qmail-local
stops and indicates a temporary failure.
Your permissions are group writable. chmod 644 .qmail-postmaster and see
if the delivery works.
Tim
--
Tim Legant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a problem with qmail. Can someone tell me how to fix it? Thanks!
- Ima Guru
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
Ima Guru wrote:
>
> I have a problem with qmail. Can someone tell me how to fix it? Thanks!
>
> - Ima Guru
Can you please stop being so verbose with your requests. You're clogging
up the requests with redundant information in your question ;) Since
you're so full in and descriptive in your question, here's the answer:
maybe
> I have a problem with qmail. Can someone tell me how to fix
> it? Thanks!
What's the problem?
> > I have a problem with qmail. Can someone tell me how to fix
> > it? Thanks!
>
> What's the problem?
I think this was meant to be some kind of cruel joke...After all, Ima Guru =
I'm A Guru? Perhaps...
/BR
Manager
InterPlanetary Solutions
http://ipsware.com/
Kinda off topic, but with the intelligent people in this group hopefully I
can get an answer.
Since qmail doesn't support fallback smtp hosts, does anyone know how to
setup linux to go out a different way...let me explain.
I have 2 dsl connections to the internet with seperate providers. As it
stands know if the one with the default route dies I am sunk unless I am
here to change. I would like to have 2 default routes and have it use one
as the primary and the other as the secondary default route. I have tried
many different things but cannot get it to work. I have tried putting both
in as default and one having a slightly higher metric and pulled the plug on
the main on, but nothing goes out until I plug it back in.
Any ideas???
Thanks,
Shane Wise
For the latest Nashville Weather Conditions
Check http://www.nashvilleweather.net
Quoted from Shane Wise:
> I have 2 dsl connections to the internet with seperate providers. As it
> stands know if the one with the default route dies I am sunk unless I am
> here to change.
Is there a way to automatically tell when one of the routes will fall
over? If so, just have a script automatically rewrite ``smtproutes''
when that happens.
---Chris K.
--
Chris, the Young One |_ If you can't afford a backup system, you can't
Auckland, New Zealand |_ afford to have important data on your computer.
http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ ---Tracy R. Reed
Hi,
i've a SCO OpenServer5 system and the rc script failed on start:
/var/qmail/rc
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH"
qmail-start ./Mailbox splogger qmail
only i see the process id, but no process is running and no logging
in syslog (because no splogger process). Have you any idea?
Thanks for the help!
best regards
gmo
trace qmail-start ./Mailbox splogger qmail
sysi86 (0x72, 0x400e04) = 12
_sysi86 (0x72, 0x400e04) = 12
chdir ("/") = 0
_chdir ("/") = 0
_umask () = 18
umask () = 18
setgroups (1, 0x7ffffd10) = 0
_setgroups (1, 0x7ffffd10) = 0
setgid (5000) = 0
_setgid (5000) = 0
fcntl (0, 0x3, 0) = 2
_fcntl (0, 0x3, 0) = 2
close (2) = 0
_close (2) = 0
fcntl (0, 0x0, 2) = 2
_fcntl (0, 0x0, 2) = 2
fcntl (0, 0x3, 0) = 2
_fcntl (0, 0x3, 0) = 2
close (3) = 0
_close (3) = 0
fcntl (0, 0x0, 3) = 3
_fcntl (0, 0x0, 3) = 3
fcntl (0, 0x3, 0) = 2
_fcntl (0, 0x3, 0) = 2
close (4) = -1 errno = 9 (Bad file number)
_close (4) = -1 errno = 9 (Bad file number)
fcntl (0, 0x0, 4) = 4
_fcntl (0, 0x0, 4) = 4
fcntl (0, 0x3, 0) = 2
_fcntl (0, 0x3, 0) = 2
close (5) = -1 errno = 9 (Bad file number)
_close (5) = -1 errno = 9 (Bad file number)
fcntl (0, 0x0, 5) = 5
_fcntl (0, 0x0, 5) = 5
fcntl (0, 0x3, 0) = 2
_fcntl (0, 0x3, 0) = 2
close (6) = -1 errno = 9 (Bad file number)
_close (6) = -1 errno = 9 (Bad file number)
fcntl (0, 0x0, 6) = 6
_fcntl (0, 0x0, 6) = 6
pipe (0x400dd4) = 0
_pipe (0x400dd4) = 0
pipe (0x400ddc) = 0
_pipe (0x400ddc) = 0
pipe (0x400de4) = 0
_pipe (0x400de4) = 0
pipe (0x400dec) = 0
_pipe (0x400dec) = 0
pipe (0x400df4) = 0
_pipe (0x400df4) = 0
pipe (0x400dfc) = 0
_pipe (0x400dfc) = 0
_fork () = 3003
_fork () = 0
fcntl (1, 0x3, 0) = 2
_fcntl (1, 0x3, 0) = 2
close (0) = 0
_close (0) = 0
fcntl (1, 0x0, 0) = 0
_fcntl (1, 0x0, 0) = 0
fcntl (8, 0x3, 0) = 1
_fcntl (8, 0x3, 0) = 1
close (1) = 0
_close (1) = 0
fcntl (8, 0x0, 1) = 1
_fcntl (8, 0x0, 1) = 1
fcntl (9, 0x3, 0) = 0
_fcntl (9, 0x3, 0) = 0
close (2) = 0
_close (2) = 0
fcntl (9, 0x0, 2) = 2
_fcntl (9, 0x0, 2) = 2
fcntl (12, 0x3, 0) = 1
_fcntl (12, 0x3, 0) = 1
close (3) = 0
_close (3) = 0
fcntl (12, 0x0, 3) = 3
_fcntl (12, 0x0, 3) = 3
fcntl (13, 0x3, 0) = 0
_fcntl (13, 0x3, 0) = 0
close (4) = 0
_close (4) = 0
fcntl (13, 0x0, 4) = 4
_fcntl (13, 0x0, 4) = 4
fcntl (16, 0x3, 0) = 1
_fcntl (16, 0x3, 0) = 1
close (5) = 0
_close (5) = 0
fcntl (16, 0x0, 5) = 5
_fcntl (16, 0x0, 5) = 5
fcntl (17, 0x3, 0) = 0
_fcntl (17, 0x3, 0) = 0
close (6) = 0
_close (6) = 0
fcntl (17, 0x0, 6) = 6
_fcntl (17, 0x0, 6) = 6
close (7) = 0
_close (7) = 0
close (8) = 0
_close (8) = 0
close (9) = 0
_close (9) = 0
close (10) = 0
_close (10) = 0
close (11) = 0
_close (11) = 0
close (12) = 0
_close (12) = 0
close (13) = 0
_close (13) = 0
close (14) = 0
_close (14) = 0
close (15) = 0
_close (15) = 0
close (16) = 0
_close (16) = 0
close (17) = 0
_close (17) = 0
close (18) = 0
_close (18) = 0
execv ("/bin/qmail-send", 0x4007d8) = -1 errno = 2 (No such file or
directory)
execv ("/usr/bin/qmail-send", 0x4007d8) = -1 errno = 2 (No such file or
directory)
execv ("/tcb/bin/qmail-send", 0x4007d8) = -1 errno = 2 (No such file or
directory)
execv ("/var/qmail/bin/qmail-send", 0x4007d8)
>>> starting /var/qmail/bin/qmail-send <<<
_exit (111) = ?
--
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
> /var/qmail/rc
> exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH"
> qmail-start ./Mailbox splogger qmail
Try:
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start ./Mailbox splogger qmail
That trailing \ helps...
/BR
Manager
InterPlanetary Solutions
http://ipsware.com/
Hi there , im really confused about the following:
Using qmail 1.03
and
vpopmail 4.9
i set up 2 virtualdomains
myfirst.domain
mysecond.domain
I want my users to have the same account on both domains therefor i set up
../vpopmail/domains/myfirst.domain/USER/Maildir
using the adduser command
and
../vpopmail/domains/mysecond.domain/.qmail-USER
to redirect mail in the "myfirst.domain-maildir"
.qmail-USER looks like the following
/../vpopmail/domains/myfirst.domain/USER/
Mails injected via SMTP to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are processed normally while
mails injected to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
produce logfile output like the following:
info msg 360546: bytes 190 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 22702 uid 503
starting delivery 1: msg 360546 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
delivery 1: deferral: Temporary_error_on_maildir_delivery._(#4.3.0)/
What the ..?
Thanx
Manuel
