'morning!
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 10:47:05PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
> > Currently trying qmail-autoresponder (http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/) :
> Great!
> > PS: the thing with "-s" is ok, but I like the "original" vacation
> > feature with $SUBJECT in _BODY_ much better : do you plan to add
> > it to qmail-autorespond ?
> Reluctantly, yes. Would something like "%S" work for you? That would
> greatly simplify the parsing logic.
Then '%SUBJECT' ? (it should be understable by "normal users", via webinterface).
Otherwise would '%S' also be ok, I can also do some parsing/search+replace
in php if necessary.
> > PPS: if there is a From: or a Reply-To: field, should the autoresponder
> > respond to this address ?
> I think not. Responding to the envelope sender is pretty much the only
> safe thing to do, and it neatly avoids all the trouble one would get
> into to properly parse an address field.
Right, these fields are not se easy to parse... Ok, I think it's already
pretty nice this way!
Now just have to find if and how it works with the
current php-vmailmgr-interface. I still need the perl suidwrapper
to be able to write the autoresponder file, but there is probably
another way to do it... Will then release a new omail-admin
version ( http://omail.omnis.ch/ ).
Regards,
Olivier
--
_________________________________________________________________
Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland
PGP signature
