Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying!

[Paul Jarc]

Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:59:27PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> > The encoded envelope sender address isn't expanded on beyond the examples
> > given, but your proposal might give a good performance increase for very
> > large lists (a la redhat.com lists, etc.).  The qmtp documentation doesn't
> > seem to mention VERP at all.
> 
> VERP expansion is handled at the moment delivery is done, irregardless
> of how the message came in.  

By qmail, sure.  But I'm asking about protocols.  Does QMTP require
servers to expand VERPs?  I think it doesn't, which unfortunately
means that a QMTP client can't send a single copy of a message with
multiple recipients on the same host if it wants VERPs.


paul