>> ... This migration will not only address
>> performace issues that have arisen due to the number of lists/members on Red
>> Hat lists, but also highly improve ease of use for list members.
They don't mention whether their performance issues were Smartlist or
qmail related. If they have evidence that Postfix is faster than qmail
at serving Mailman lists, I'd sure like to see it.
Smartlist vs. Mailman is a no-brainer. Mailman vs. ezmlm is far more
interesting. Mailman is prettier, with its fancy web interface. But
ezmlm has automatic VERP-based bounce handling and doesn't require a
web server or the use of a web interface.
I'd like to know if they decided against ezmlm primarily because of
Mailman's web interface. Or perhaps they just decided to switch to
Postfix and Mailman was the best list manager available.
-Dave
